Teams

CACM RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03vs SKY BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Anadiotis / David Duganne vs Philip Briere / Brian Dwyer0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Peters / Jay Rael vs Ryan Goodale / Chris Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-27vs CP BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJay Rael / Michael Peters vs Troy Kilen / Brett Beard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-20vs WP YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJay Logan / David Duganne vs Brandon Paxton / Michael MacHado4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Greenhouse / Jay Rael vs Tony Gubenko / Chris Carry6-3, 6-2
2024-08-13vs SKY GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJay Rael vs Elmo Morales6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Duganne / Michael Berman vs Bentley Hodges / David Garrison3-6, 2-6
2024-08-06vs GPTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Anadiotis / Tony Chapin vs David Junta / Carlos Hinrichsen5-7, 1-6
2024-07-30vs CP REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Duganne / Jay Logan vs Louis Bissette / Alan Caffey7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJay Rael / Michael Peters vs Michael Evans / Daniel Yamagishi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-23vs CM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTony Chapin / John Anadiotis vs Christopher Hailes / Michael Pardun4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJay Logan / David Duganne vs Taylor Weir / Buck Flannigan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Blake Legatt
published 4
3.29
Jay Logan
published
3.27
David Duganne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
John Anadiotis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Charles Greenhouse
published 3.5
3.15
Jay Rael
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Tony Chapin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Duganne + Jay Logan9757% games+4.3% vs expected
David Duganne + Jay Rael81049% games−1.8% vs expected
John Anadiotis + Charles Greenhouse2339% games−3.4% vs expected
John Anadiotis + David Duganne3543% gamesnot enough data
John Anadiotis + Jay Rael3352% gamesnot enough data
John Anadiotis + Tony Chapin213 matchesnot enough data
Jay Logan + Jay Rael123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blake Legatt
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Jay Logan
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
David Duganne
104W–94L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
John Anadiotis
55W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Charles Greenhouse
15W–20L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Jay Rael
59W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Tony Chapin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.