Teams

LEBTC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-02vs SS-H ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Conroy / Teresa Flecky vs Catherine Corbett / Kay Roesch3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLana Pierce / Ann Stafford vs Denise Gebes / Ursula Geiger3-6, 3-6
2023-07-26vs PCRK GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesLana Pierce / Ann Stafford vs Barbara Gentry / Cynthia Glasier6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Susan Conroy vs Debra Stamatis / Shari Procopio6-0, 6-0
2023-07-19vs LEBTC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Denise van Essen vs Gi Gi McShane / Jeanne Sadowski0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Jewell / Carol Gregory vs Rita Danna / Nancy Ramsey6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLana Pierce / Carol Nappholz vs Christine Brekke / Carlene Chrisman4-6, 6-7
2023-07-12vs SS-H ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Carol Nappholz vs Sally Berglund / Nancy Hallowell2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Haines / Lana Pierce vs Catherine Corbett / Kay Roesch3-6, 4-6
2023-07-05vs PCRK GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLana Pierce / Denise van Essen vs Jody Mumaugh / Ann Habeger0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Stafford / Janet Jewell vs Shari Procopio / Cynthia Glasier5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-28vs LEBTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesLana Pierce / Ann Stafford vs Caryn Moller / Debbie Welsh2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Denise van Essen
published 4
3.71
Teresa Flecky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Ann Stafford
published 4
3.54
Janet Jewell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Leslie Haines
published
3.39
Lana Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Susan Conroy
published
Carol Nappholz
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise van Essen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Teresa Flecky
64W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Ann Stafford
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Janet Jewell
22W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Leslie Haines
8W–22L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lana Pierce
72W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.39
Susan Conroy
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carol Nappholz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.