Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-02vs PCRK GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Brekke / Gi Gi McShane vs Barbara Gentry / Jody Mumaugh6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Sadowski / Debbie Welsh vs Shari Procopio / Barbara Weisberg7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-26vs SS-H ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanne Sadowski / Marty Oliver vs Marty Smith / Mary Murray0-6, 2-6
2023-07-19vs LEBTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesGi Gi McShane / Jeanne Sadowski vs Teresa Flecky / Denise van Essen6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-12vs PCRK GREENLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeanne Sadowski / Patty Weston vs Jody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarty Oliver / Caryn Moller vs Ann Habeger / Shari Procopio6-7, 5-7
2023-07-05vs SS-H ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesGi Gi McShane / Jeanne Sadowski vs Ursula Geiger / Angie Sanders2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCaryn Moller / Patty Weston vs Nancy Hallowell / Marty Smith2-6, 0-6
2023-06-28vs LEBTC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaryn Moller / Debbie Welsh vs Lana Pierce / Ann Stafford6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGi Gi McShane / Marty Oliver vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jeanne Sadowski
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Debbie Welsh
published 4
3.49
Gi Gi McShane
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Caryn Moller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Patty Weston
published
Rita Danna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Sadowski + Gi Gi McShane1539% gamesnot enough data
Gi Gi McShane + Rita Danna224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Sadowski + Caryn Moller213 matchesnot enough data
Caryn Moller + Debbie Welsh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeanne Sadowski
38W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Debbie Welsh
11W–27L career · type A · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Gi Gi McShane
42W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Caryn Moller
89W–137L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Weston
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Rita Danna
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.