Teams

Laramie Passing Shots

2025 USTA 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-29vs Teton NetLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Peck / Sharon Buccino vs Heather Silverman / Kelly Milligan6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Sheri Foster vs Cheri Witz / Linda Merigliano4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlyson Hagy / Michelle Bush vs Tami DeGrosky / Vicki Davis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-28vs Teton NetWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Peck / Troy Ibarra vs Heather Silverman / Kelly Milligan5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Foster / Michelle Bush vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSharon Buccino / Ellen Laubhan vs Kristina Peterson / Vicki Davis6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-28vs Teton NetWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Buccino / Ellen Laubhan vs Kelly Milligan / Heather Silverman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Nancy Peck vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTroy Ibarra / Alyson Hagy vs Tami DeGrosky / Kristina Peterson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laramie Passing Shots21631084
2Teton Net12361497

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyson Hagy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Sheri Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Ellen Laubhan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Michelle Bush
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Hayes
published
Nancy Peck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Buccino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Troy Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Peck + Ellen Laubhan10162% gamesnot enough data
Megan Hayes + Ellen Laubhan8156% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Foster + Michelle Bush2442% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Buccino + Ellen Laubhan4248% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Buccino + Alyson Hagy0546% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Peck + Alyson Hagy213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Hayes + Alyson Hagy213 matchesnot enough data
Troy Ibarra + Sheri Foster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyson Hagy
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Sheri Foster
51W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Ellen Laubhan
124W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Michelle Bush
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Megan Hayes
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Peck
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Buccino
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Troy Ibarra
46W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.