Teams

Teton Net

2025 USTA 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-29vs Laramie Passing ShotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Silverman / Kelly Milligan vs Nancy Peck / Sharon Buccino3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCheri Witz / Linda Merigliano vs Megan Hayes / Sheri Foster6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Vicki Davis vs Alyson Hagy / Michelle Bush6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-28vs Laramie Passing ShotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Milligan / Heather Silverman vs Sharon Buccino / Ellen Laubhan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Cheri Witz vs Megan Hayes / Nancy Peck6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Kristina Peterson vs Troy Ibarra / Alyson Hagy3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-28vs Laramie Passing ShotsLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Silverman / Kelly Milligan vs Nancy Peck / Troy Ibarra7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Cheri Witz vs Sheri Foster / Michelle Bush4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristina Peterson / Vicki Davis vs Sharon Buccino / Ellen Laubhan7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laramie Passing Shots21631084
2Teton Net12361497

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Heather Silverman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.76
Vicki Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Cheri Witz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Linda Merigliano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Tami DeGrosky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Kelly Milligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristina Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Silverman + Kelly Milligan123 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Peterson + Kelly Milligan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Silverman
82W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Vicki Davis
29W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Cheri Witz
30W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Linda Merigliano
49W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Tami DeGrosky
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Kelly Milligan
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kristina Peterson
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.