Teams

Al.DeMacy18T

2025 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs Je.SagalSolomon18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Baltzer / Kelly Thompson vs Christy van Ness / Lea Edmondson6-3, 6-2
2025-07-10vs La.Fye18T3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLauren Hampton / Emily Palanzo vs Erin Maher / Stephanie Poley1-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs Ga.Scoggin18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Waychoff / Emily Palanzo vs Charlotte Mercer / Gail Scoggin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-22vs Ma.Cambo18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Hampton / Emily Palanzo vs Melissa Pereira / Kalli Unthank7-5, 3-2
2025-06-19vs Ki.Manning18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Potter / Kelly Baltzer vs Stephanie Fogarty / Rossana Prevost6-4, 6-4
2025-05-22vs Su.Braga18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Potter / Kelly Baltzer vs Shelley Truman / Nikki Hastings6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Allison DeMacy
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.49
April Bazin
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.36
Amanda Campbell
published 3.5
3.35
Elizabeth Carroll
published
3.29
Jennifer Kaulback
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.28
Kristen Levine
published
2.98
Stephanie Bradley
published
2.79
Christine Waychoff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Kelly Baltzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Emily Palanzo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.41
Lauren Hampton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hampton + Emily Palanzo3348% games+8.9% vs expected
Amanda Campbell + April Bazin5259% games−2.3% vs expected
Christine Waychoff + Emily Palanzo1643% gamesnot enough data
Allison DeMacy + April Bazin5167% gamesnot enough data
Christine Waychoff + Jennifer Kaulback4254% gamesnot enough data
Christine Waychoff + Stephanie Bradley314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Waychoff + April Bazin213 matchesnot enough data
April Bazin + Kristen Levine303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison DeMacy
272W–118L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
April Bazin
186W–117L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Amanda Campbell
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Elizabeth Carroll
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Jennifer Kaulback
124W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Kristen Levine
27W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Stephanie Bradley
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Christine Waychoff
73W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
2.5
Kelly Baltzer
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Emily Palanzo
21W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Lauren Hampton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.