Teams

CV-Mission Hills CC/L Lober

2021 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesSue Lambert / Linda Moskowitz vs Thelma Sahara / Carrie Jeha3-6, 1-6
2021-05-08vs LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarguerita Gilbertson / Linda Moskowitz vs Christine Querrey / Betty Grant1-6, 0-6
2021-05-02vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert/WolfeLost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Lambert / Linda Moskowitz vs Janice Ashton / Lori Greenman2-6, 1-6
2021-05-01vs CV-Palm Springs TC/Woods/FoxLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Judith Brauer vs Molly Woods / Staci Munic6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-25vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Sara AsatianiLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorgette LePage / Judith Brauer vs Nadine Kim / Lesley Gagnon2-6, 4-6
2021-04-18vs CV-Andalusia CC/L KilburnLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Laura Susskind vs Tammy Kitterman / Ailee Robertson4-6, 6-7
2021-04-17vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Jo Burns BalinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSue Lambert / Marguerita Gilbertson vs Dana Turban / Claire Seibly6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudith Brauer / Andrea Primer vs Lori Tanking / Teresa Makhijani6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Mary Kaump
published
3.45
Andrea Primer
published 3.5
2.99
Linda Moskowitz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Nancy Pacharzina
published
Judith Brauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Ann Robinow
published 3
2.43
Laurie Lober
published
Laura Susskind
published
Sue Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Kaump
27W–24L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Andrea Primer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
Linda Moskowitz
39W–81L career · 5 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.99
Nancy Pacharzina
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
2.94
3
Judith Brauer
37W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ann Robinow
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Laurie Lober
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.43
Laura Susskind
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sue Lambert
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.