Teams

STSC-Wheeler

2024 ADULT 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-18vs TTC-BarthSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Khuelien Dretke vs Donna Keim / Jane Brass Barth0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlejandra Clemens / Catherine Wheeler vs Staci Schipporeit / Katherine Gibbs6-3, 6-1
2023-11-10vs ESTC-RolnickLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Maggie Hudson vs Katie Clawson / Karen Osuna4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Naomi Glenn vs Darci Christian / Cathleen Karcher7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Reid / Alejandra Clemens vs Isabel Kelly / Sarah Wiggins0-6, 4-6
2023-10-28vs S OR-ACB-FedorLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Maggie Hudson vs Christina Godat / Karen Berky3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Alejandra Clemens vs Elana Fedor / Sheryl Fewkes4-6, 2-6
2023-10-27vs ESTC-RolnickWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Maggie Hudson vs Julie Mohler / Sue Devereux4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKhuelien Dretke / Jill Ainsworth vs Karen Osuna / Isabel Kelly6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Janet Lui-Hansen vs Cathleen Karcher / Sarah Wiggins6-3, 6-2
2023-10-22vs ATFC-BeckettLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Lui-Hansen / Naomi Glenn vs Gogi Villanueva / Janel Hahn3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Lisa Reid vs Joanne Beckett / Dana Yearsley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Peters / Alejandra Clemens vs ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER / Martha Kelly4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-24vs TTC-BarthWon 30
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kessinger / Maggie Hudson vs Ann Yost / Staci Schipporeit6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Naomi Glenn vs Claudia Hamilton / Sandi Mickey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Ainsworth / Khuelien Dretke vs Katherine Gibbs / Xiaotong Wang7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-17vs ATFC-BeckettLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Naomi Glenn vs Martha Kelly / Heather Bartlett2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Kessinger / Lisa Reid vs Nora Knox / Dana Yearsley3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKhuelien Dretke / Connie Peters vs Alexis Packer / Ellen Miller7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-16vs S OR-ACB-FedorLost 03
L#1 DoublesRhonda Kessinger / Lisa Reid vs Elana Fedor / Susan Massey3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Naomi Glenn vs Irene Moore / Christina Godat6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Peters / Khuelien Dretke vs Janey Evans / Karen Berky3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Rhonda Kessinger
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Jennifer Schmelling
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Alejandra Clemens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Connie Peters
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Catherine Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.59
Janet Lui-Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Maggie Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.29
Jill Ainsworth
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Lisa Reid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Khuelien Dretke
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Naomi Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Schmelling + Rhonda Kessinger5752% games+8.5% vs expected
Naomi Glenn + Rhonda Kessinger2340% games−8.2% vs expected
Naomi Glenn + Catherine Wheeler2544% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Jill Ainsworth6072% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Schmelling + Maggie Hudson224 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Wheeler + Jennifer Schmelling123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Wheeler + Janet Lui-Hansen123 matchesnot enough data
Jill Ainsworth + Khuelien Dretke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rhonda Kessinger
25W–47L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jennifer Schmelling
75W–83L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Alejandra Clemens
31W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Connie Peters
53W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Catherine Wheeler
67W–46L career · 9 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Janet Lui-Hansen
42W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Maggie Hudson
78W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jill Ainsworth
51W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Reid
64W–53L career · 8 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Khuelien Dretke
8W–11L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Naomi Glenn
4W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.