Teams

Ice Princesses

Fire & Ice 2024 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-08vs Dominion GrinchesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Perez-Shelton / Gina Jones vs Laurie Garbett / Paula Gerloff1-6, 2-6
2024-12-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Perez-Shelton / Irma Trevino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-08vs Blazing AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Rodriguez / Maria Perez-Shelton vs Roxana Aguilar / ANGELA Bush4-6, 4-6
2024-12-08vs Holiday Hit SquadWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lakata / Bessie Trammell vs Sarah Kazen / Amber Yuker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Castellaw / Karen Gauthier vs Patoa Belgam / Peggy Ussery7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesIrma Trevino / Lily Schwegler vs Jackie Kemp / Dee Lorkovic6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Lily Schwegler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Maggie Lakata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Gina Rodriguez
published
3.06
Lori Castellaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Tatyana Garcia
published
2.95
Karen Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Irma Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Bessie Trammell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Christa Henarie
published 3
Maria Perez-Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Lucy Novak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bessie Trammell + Maggie Lakata9257% games+5.1% vs expected
Irma Trevino + Gina Rodriguez11554% games−1.2% vs expected
Karen Gauthier + Gina Rodriguez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lily Schwegler
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
Maggie Lakata
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Gina Rodriguez
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Lori Castellaw
30W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Tatyana Garcia
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Karen Gauthier
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Irma Trevino
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Bessie Trammell
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Christa Henarie
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Maria Perez-Shelton
44W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucy Novak
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.