Teams

Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

19 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-28vs Seay/Park-Calhoun W3.5SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Parsons vs Monica Knake6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPamela Sewak / Melissa Brueningsen vs Weezie Margolis / Katie Campbell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-21Split 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Parsons vs Marianna Clement6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJena Anderson / Diana Dildy vs Rebecca Scott / Angie Wood1-6, 1-6
2025-06-07vs Garland/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5SLost 04
L#1 DoublesJana Chester / Rebecca Stevens vs Ella Li / Hsiao-Wen Chang2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEimear May vs Kiera Lowe1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Brueningsen / Diana Dildy vs Linh Pham / Hanh Nguyen3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPamela Sewak / Patricia Jacobs vs Heidi McKee / Tram Pham1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jana Chester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Elizabeth Parsons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Marci Frenkel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.29
Blair Ward
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Jena Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Eimear May
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Morgan Gulbas
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
Heather Smercina
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.97
Diana Wohldmann
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Pamela Sewak
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.85
Jessica Kirwan
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Maria Goble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Diana Dildy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Asheley Wagnon
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.74
Dionne Flynn
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Schmeltz
published
Leslie Atkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Melissa Brueningsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Frenkel + Morgan Gulbas4256% games+9.8% vs expected
Heather Smercina + Maria Goble2350% games+9.6% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Dionne Flynn4844% games+3.5% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Heather Smercina3253% gamesnot enough data
Dionne Flynn + Heather Smercina134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jana Chester
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Elizabeth Parsons
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Marci Frenkel
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Blair Ward
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jena Anderson
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Eimear May
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Morgan Gulbas
11W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Heather Smercina
22W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Diana Wohldmann
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
Pamela Sewak
7W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Jessica Kirwan
11W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Maria Goble
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Diana Dildy
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Asheley Wagnon
7W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Dionne Flynn
8W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Kim Schmeltz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Atkins
8W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Brueningsen
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Jacobs
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.