Teams

Seay/Park-Calhoun W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-28vs Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5SWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Walker / Miriam Spradling vs Asheley Wagnon / Blair Ward7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Saland / Natalie Sorrell vs Dionne Flynn / Morgan Gulbas7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWeezie Margolis / Katie Campbell vs Pamela Sewak / Melissa Brueningsen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-14vs Garland/Sisk-Lin W3.5SLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Burton / Emily Seifert vs Katie Threadgill / Addison Cheek4-6, 3-6
2025-05-17vs Las Colinas/Bosworth W3.5SWon 10
W#2 DoublesWeezie Margolis / Katie Campbell vs Ann Lutich / Missy Taylor3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMiriam Spradling / Libby Johnson vs Catherine Kumar / Melissa Feste6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRochelle Watson / Rebecca Heller vs Julie Fecht / Lynda Bennett6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Walker / Natalie Sorrell vs Gerry Newman / Leona Halama6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5SLost 02
L#2 DoublesWeezie Margolis / Monica Knake vs Mary Beth Weatherford / Hilary Baker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMayada Naami / Lisa Park vs Angie Wood / Rebecca Scott0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Rochelle Watson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Amanda Robertson
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.45
Karen Saland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.25
Monica Knake
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.23
Natalie Sorrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Judy Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Karla Baumgartner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Jennifer Calhoun
published
3.06
Rebecca Heller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Seifert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Erika Burton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Libby Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lolly Landwehr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mayada Naami
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miriam Spradling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Carson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Weezie Margolis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rochelle Watson + Emily Seifert4155% gamesnot enough data
Rochelle Watson + Molly Carson4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rochelle Watson
32W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Amanda Robertson
21W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Karen Saland
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Monica Knake
17W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Natalie Sorrell
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Judy Marlow
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Karla Baumgartner
11W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Calhoun
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Rebecca Heller
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Emily Seifert
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erika Burton
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Libby Johnson
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lolly Landwehr
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mayada Naami
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Miriam Spradling
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Carson
16W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Weezie Margolis
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.