Teams

Indy 5.5W CRC Meyer

Spring USTA Central Indiana Combo · CIN Indy Combo 5.5 Women, SP

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-01vs Indy 5.5W JCC ValentineLost 12
W#1 DoublesNatali Runestad / Reagan Whiteman vs Sara McClammer / Megan Kriebel7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMaggie Flowers / Cecilia Waterman vs Cole Healy / Sarah Wallace5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBriAnn Gibson / Claudia Manzur vs Rachele Fraker / Alisha Valentine0-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs Indy 5.5W IRCE TaylorLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Ristow / Katharine Funke vs Annette Moore / Eileen O'Brien Metzger2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElena Ordas / Claudia Manzur vs Rachel Riegel / Emily Shumaker0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCecilia Waterman / Natali Runestad vs Jo Fowler / Alex Belden7-5, 6-1
2026-04-22vs Indy 5.5W IRCD CarlsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelleen Kennedy / Katharine Funke vs Julianna Fitzgerald / Hannah Wannemuehler3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Manzur / Elena Ordas vs Amy Groswald Hess / Kelli Speer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Lawrence / Zoe Sauer vs Julie Calvert / Laura Critchlow0-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs Indy 5.5W CRC GoelzLost 02
L#2 DoublesNatali Runestad / Cecilia Waterman vs Corey Diehl / Paula Cirrito0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBriAnn Gibson / Angie Terry vs Sofia Flood / Stephanie Wang0-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs Indy 5.5W IND CarnesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngie Terry / Cecilia Waterman vs Susan Bentley / Bridget Hilts6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAvery Smith / Maggie Flowers vs Kriss Bowes / Meryl Stuckey2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Lawrence / Anna Ristow vs Katie Butler / Molly Carnes6-2, 6-0
2026-04-01vs Indy 5.5W IRCD HoldenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnna Ristow / Katharine Funke vs Megan Madia / Lisa Hoskin7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Wojcicki / Reagan Whiteman vs Emma Harmon / Louise Lombard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesZoe Sauer / Cecilia Waterman vs Kathy Collins / Katherine Kikalos1-6, 5-7
2026-03-25vs Indy 5.5W JCC FritzWon 30
W#1 DoublesElena Ordas / Claudia Manzur vs Tara Pearson / Courtney Hatch6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoan Lawrence / Susan Wojcicki vs Erin Fox / Jennifer Timpe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaggie Flowers / Avery Smith vs Ivy Wright / Caitlin O'Connor7-6, 6-0
2026-03-18vs Indy 5.5W CSWC HackneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesReagan Whiteman / Susan Wojcicki vs Dianne Ebling / Sue Spicer7-5, 2-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie Flowers / Cecilia Waterman vs Shannon Swindell / Lindsay Swindell4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelleen Kennedy / BriAnn Gibson vs Fusako Omiya / Christine Oakley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indy Combo 5.5 Women, SP
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy 5.5W CRC Goelz6115615145
2Indy 5.5W IRCD Holden6114715144
3Indy 5.5W IRCD Carlson5215614141
4Indy 5.5W CSWC Hackney34101126197
5Indy 5.5W IRCE Taylor3491226190
6Indy 5.5W JCC Valentine3491228206
7Indy 5.5W CRC Meyer2581329220
8Indy 5.5W IND Carnes000000
9Indy 5.5W JCC Fritz0741736228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Lora Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Anna Ristow
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.92
Susan Wojcicki
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.72
Natali Runestad
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Claudia Manzur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Kelleen Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Angie Terry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Maggie Flowers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Zoe Sauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Katharine Funke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Cecilia Waterman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.09
Joan Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.99
Avery Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.88
BriAnn Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelleen Kennedy + Anna Ristow10463% games+15.2% vs expected
Susan Wojcicki + Anna Ristow3548% games+4.2% vs expected
Kelleen Kennedy + Zoe Sauer2542% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Flowers + Zoe Sauer5164% gamesnot enough data
Joan Lawrence + Avery Smith2347% gamesnot enough data
Angie Terry + Claudia Manzur2343% gamesnot enough data
Susan Wojcicki + Maggie Flowers3251% gamesnot enough data
Kelleen Kennedy + Susan Wojcicki224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lora Meyer
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3
Anna Ristow
79W–71L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Susan Wojcicki
52W–73L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Natali Runestad
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Claudia Manzur
26W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Kelleen Kennedy
36W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Angie Terry
28W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Maggie Flowers
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Zoe Sauer
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Katharine Funke
16W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Cecilia Waterman
20W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Joan Lawrence
14W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Avery Smith
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
BriAnn Gibson
4W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.