Teams

Indy 5.5W CRC Goelz

Spring USTA Central Indiana Combo · CIN Indy Combo 5.5 Women, SP

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-29vs Indy 5.5W IRCD HoldenLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacie Courtney / Paula Cirrito vs Veronica Mercke / Nicole Sonn4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Craddock / Kiley LoCascio vs Michelle Trotter / Grace Maher6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYuliya Mccain / Elise Mcdonald vs Denise Katz / Louise Lombard0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-25vs Indy 5.5W IND CarnesWon 10
W#3 DoublesElise Mcdonald / Girs Alina vs Kellie Eagle / Glenia Pena Lugo6-1, 6-0
2026-04-22vs Indy 5.5W JCC FritzWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaula Cirrito / Stacie Courtney vs Courtney Reinkemeyer / Erin Dammann6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElise Mcdonald / Yuliya Mccain vs Erin Fox / Ivy Wright6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSofia Flood / Stephanie Wang vs Tara Pearson / MaryCatharine Grau4-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs Indy 5.5W CRC MeyerWon 20
W#2 DoublesCorey Diehl / Paula Cirrito vs Natali Runestad / Cecilia Waterman6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSofia Flood / Stephanie Wang vs BriAnn Gibson / Angie Terry6-0, 6-2
2026-04-15vs Indy 5.5W CSWC HackneyWon 21
L#1 DoublesStacie Courtney / Yuliya Mccain vs Andrea Hoffman / Christine Oakley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Cirrito / Sofia Flood vs Sue Spicer / Dianne Ebling6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElise Mcdonald / Ruth Goelz vs Fusako Omiya / Julie Okotie3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Indy 5.5W IRCE TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacie Courtney / Yuliya Mccain vs Alex Belden / Eileen O'Brien Metzger6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRuth Goelz / Elise Mcdonald vs Julie Dunscomb / Gia Paterno5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSofia Flood / Stephanie Wang vs Sharon Baxter / Carolyn Kinsey6-1, 6-3
2026-03-24vs Indy 5.5W JCC ValentineWon 30
W#1 DoublesCorey Diehl / Paula Cirrito vs Katie Geik / Erin Wessels6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKiley LoCascio / Jessica Craddock vs Alisha Valentine / Rachele Fraker7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Goelz / Elise Mcdonald vs Laura Bobinsky / Sarah Werner6-3, 6-4
2026-03-18vs Indy 5.5W IRCD CarlsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacie Courtney / Paula Cirrito vs Whitney Bogus / Laura Critchlow6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJessica Craddock / Kiley LoCascio vs Katie Katris / Hannah Wannemuehler4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElise Mcdonald / Yuliya Mccain vs Ashley Welch / Kelli Speer6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indy Combo 5.5 Women, SP
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy 5.5W CRC Goelz6115615145
2Indy 5.5W IRCD Holden6114715144
3Indy 5.5W IRCD Carlson5215614141
4Indy 5.5W CSWC Hackney34101126197
5Indy 5.5W IRCE Taylor3491226190
6Indy 5.5W JCC Valentine3491228206
7Indy 5.5W CRC Meyer2581329220
8Indy 5.5W IND Carnes000000
9Indy 5.5W JCC Fritz0741736228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kiley LoCascio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Elise Mcdonald
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.92
Stacie Courtney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Corey Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Sofia Flood
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Paula Cirrito
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Stephanie Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Girs Alina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.47
Ruth Goelz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Jessica Craddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corey Diehl + Kiley LoCascio5454% games+4.6% vs expected
Ruth Goelz + Stephanie Wang3350% gamesnot enough data
Sofia Flood + Paula Cirrito314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Wang + Jessica Craddock224 matchesnot enough data
Sofia Flood + Stephanie Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Goelz + Elise Mcdonald213 matchesnot enough data
Kiley LoCascio + Jessica Craddock213 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Courtney + Paula Cirrito213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kiley LoCascio
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Elise Mcdonald
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Stacie Courtney
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Corey Diehl
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Sofia Flood
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Paula Cirrito
17W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.65
Stephanie Wang
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.57
2.5
Girs Alina
11W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%41%59%
2.53
Ruth Goelz
23W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
Jessica Craddock
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.