Teams

X18 7.0 CSC Langmack

2025 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs X18 7.0 MV1 GustafsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrandon Farley / Blair Kurit vs Garnett Meador / Holly Yotter6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Fries / Joseph MacDonald vs Ken Gustafson / Xiaozhong Men4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-20vs NEO/Ung/X18/7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Ryan / Clark Langmack vs Joseph Stimac / Rebecca Drenovsky6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gidlow / Michael Seidman vs Gary Fleming / Kate Bishop7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrent Ryan / Jane Heistand vs Liza Brady / Frank Mercuri3-6, 1-6
2025-06-29vs X18 7.0 JP MoserWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gidlow / Michael Seidman vs Kathleen Moser / Kevin Moser6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBlair Kurit / Brent Ryan vs Jennifer Wirtz / Grant Nassif6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Geier / Jack Prause vs Joy Akuchie / Dobie Moser7-6, 6-4
2025-06-15vs X18 7.0 MV1 GustafsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesKerri Dray / Brandon Farley vs Robert Haught / Yulia Lyublinski6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Goldberg / Matthew Lehman vs Jan Kolesar / David Kolesar2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Ryan / Brent Ryan vs Pamela Zalba / Garnett Meador7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-08vs NEO/Ung/X18/7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Tirrell / Emily Geier vs Phong Nguyen / Donna Fleming2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesClark Langmack / Blair Kurit vs Gary Fleming / Eileen Connell4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Fries / Michael Seidman vs Kelly Jordan / Bob Brown6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-18vs X18 7.0 JP MoserWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Goldberg / Clark Langmack vs Kathleen Moser / Ajayi Monell6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErin Ryan / Michael Seidman vs Kevin Moser / Joy Akuchie6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrandon Farley / Catey Peters vs James Dray / Jennifer Wirtz6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Clark Langmack
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Daniel Tirrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Jennifer Gidlow
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Kerri Dray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Stacy Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Brandon Farley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Catey Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kylie Eyre
published
3.13
Emily Geier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Blair Kurit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Patricia Fries
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Brent Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Jack Prause
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jane Heistand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Seidman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Peter Geier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Geier + Emily Geier3343% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Goldberg + Clark Langmack314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Gidlow + Clark Langmack123 matchesnot enough data
Brandon Farley + Stacy Goldberg123 matchesnot enough data
Brandon Farley + Kylie Eyre123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clark Langmack
40W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Daniel Tirrell
25W–14L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Jennifer Gidlow
71W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Kerri Dray
62W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
Stacy Goldberg
96W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Brandon Farley
25W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Catey Peters
52W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Kylie Eyre
71W–17L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Emily Geier
76W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Blair Kurit
36W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Patricia Fries
36W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Brent Ryan
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Jack Prause
55W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Jane Heistand
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Joseph MacDonald
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Lehman
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Seidman
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Geier
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.