Teams

LA-LLW-Hitmen-Victor Burga

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Men 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.72 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs LA - 40-LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Gonda / Samuel Josephs vs Michael Marley / Peter Gopaoco3-6, 1-6
2024-02-24vs LA - ELITE 24Won 10
W#3 DoublesEric Gonda / Nicolas Stansbury vs Lionel Michael / Daniel Soto6-1, 7-6
2024-02-21vs LA - Griffin ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesVictor Burga / Eric Gonda vs Nicolas Gentin / Rick Lucas5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-10vs LA - Hollywood No NamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Hannes Schenk vs Shawn Hatosy / Jamie McShane7-5, 6-1
2024-01-28vs LA - 40-LoveWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarlos Cruz-Aedo vs Michele Greco6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEric Gonda / Adam Scott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-06vs LA - Hollywood No NamesLost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Gonda / Amit Gupta vs Daniel Carlton / James Mason2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hannes Schenk
published 5
4.59
Luke Roloff
published
4.56
EDWARD CHOI
published 5
4.55
Eugene Tran
published 5
4.47
Nicolas Stansbury
published
4.36
4.33
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published 4.5
4.29
William Konya
published
4.28
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
John Lansville
published
4.20
Eric Gonda
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Amit Gupta
published 5
4.08
Adam Scott
published 4.5
3.83
Jermaine Montgomery
published
Victor Burga
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lansville + Nicolas Stansbury213 matchesnot enough data
Amit Gupta + Luke Roloff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Hannes Schenk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luke Roloff
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.59
5
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.56
5
Eugene Tran
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.55
Nicolas Stansbury
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
Alexander Kantarelis
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.33
William Konya
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
78W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
John Lansville
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Eric Gonda
66W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
5
Amit Gupta
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
4.09
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Jermaine Montgomery
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.83
Victor Burga
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.