Teams

SDNC 3.5 El Camino CC (2:2)/ Rush

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs SDNC 3.5 La Costa(3:1)/ CarmichaelLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Guiltner / Carl Slabicki vs Brendan Hayes / Alex Schardt3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesArthur Lawida / Scott Guiltner vs Mike Still / Gary Schwartz6-2, 6-2
2025-02-16vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC(2:2)/ PatwardhanWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Guiltner / David Napper vs Deepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Guiltner / David Napper vs David Coughlin / Naresh Bhavaraju4-6, 4-6
2025-01-12vs SDNC 3.5 RSFTC (2:2)/ ReicherWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Guiltner / John Sherritt vs Brian Hays / Christopher Baker6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Scott Guiltner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Robert Bacon
published
3.30
Mark Rush
published
3.28
David Napper
published 3.5
3.25
Ken Moran
published
3.22
Arthur Lawida
published 3.5
3.21
Eric Gozlan
published
2.83
Scot Tammen
published
Gary Ross
published
John Sherritt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Guiltner + David Napper8554% games+2.4% vs expected
Robert Bacon + Ken Moran5352% games+1.9% vs expected
Scott Guiltner + Robert Bacon213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Rush + David Napper123 matchesnot enough data
Eric Gozlan + Robert Bacon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Scott Guiltner
41W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Robert Bacon
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mark Rush
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
David Napper
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Ken Moran
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Arthur Lawida
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Eric Gozlan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Scot Tammen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Gary Ross
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Sherritt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.