Teams

SDNC 3.5 RPTC(2:2)/ Patwardhan

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesDeepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan vs Nicholas Esayian / Robert Laplante6-3, 6-3
2025-03-16vs SDNC 3.5 RDO(3:1)/ LeungLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan vs Todd Walker / Eric Berryman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs SDNC 3.5 Santaluz(2:2)/ BahaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Park / Ronnie Reyno vs Mark Anderson / Ray Gliner2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-16vs SDNC 3.5 El Camino CC (2:2)/ RushLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan vs Scott Guiltner / David Napper3-6, 3-6
2025-02-01Split 11
L#2 DoublesDeepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan vs Jim Evans / Jim Titus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRonnie Reyno / David Miers vs Gary Schwartz / Erik Jensen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-19vs SDNC LLW 3.5 KCP Rangers/ WarrenWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeepak Challa / Ravindra Patwardhan vs Jeffrey Felix / Brad Bartlett6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ravindra Patwardhan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Daniel Gant
published 3.5
3.29
Manohar Kandagadla
published
3.26
Dana Gibson
published 3.5
3.25
Deepak Challa
published 3.5
3.19
Ronnie Reyno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Jim Chen
published
3.14
David Miers
published 3.5
3.03
Manny Vega
published
3.00
John Noerenberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Noerenberg + Dana Gibson044 matchesnot enough data
Ronnie Reyno + Dana Gibson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ravindra Patwardhan
67W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Daniel Gant
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Manohar Kandagadla
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dana Gibson
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Deepak Challa
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Karthik Rudrapatnaadishesha
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ronnie Reyno
53W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Jim Chen
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
David Miers
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Manny Vega
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
John Noerenberg
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.