Teams

Odell Rogerson SC

2025 SC Adult COMBO 40 & Over -AATL · Adult Women 40 & Over Combo 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-17vs Landon SC 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesReiko Kretz / Lori Pope vs Marla Williams / Carlene Clark4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Rogerson / Dana Davis vs Trudie Gill-Keenly / Susan Trammell5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-27vs Landon SC 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesReiko Kretz / Diane Harrison vs Kelly Mercier / Mary Harper0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChrissa Matthews / Donna Edwards vs Laurel Landon / Trudie Gill-Keenly1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Rogerson / Alyssa Degnan vs Susan Trammell / Michelle Coleman0-6, 4-6
2025-07-13vs Landon SC 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesReiko Kretz / Angela Magnuson vs Barbara Outley / Kimberly Beavers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrooke Homan / Chrissa Matthews vs Susan Trammell / Teresa Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Starling / Alyssa Degnan vs Laurel Landon / Michelle Coleman6-2, 6-4
2025-07-06vs Landon SC 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Pope / Julea Hovey vs MacEy Miller / Kelly Anne Moore4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKeisha Uhle / Dana Davis vs Mary Harper / Carlene Clark6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSally Starling / Donna Edwards vs Susan Trammell / Teresa Johnson3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 40 & Over Combo 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Chrissa Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Sally Starling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Reiko Kretz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Cathy Traver
published 4
3.74
Julea Hovey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Kathleen Rogerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Angela Magnuson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Keisha Uhle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Lori Pope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Diane Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Brooke Homan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Alyssa Degnan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Donna Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Magnuson + Lori Pope4167% games+8.9% vs expected
Angela Magnuson + Kathleen Rogerson4453% games+7.3% vs expected
Reiko Kretz + Angela Magnuson4459% games+7.2% vs expected
Reiko Kretz + Kathleen Rogerson5162% games+3.7% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Lori Pope8455% games+3.0% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Angela Magnuson231060% games+2.5% vs expected
Angela Magnuson + Keisha Uhle5154% games−0.0% vs expected
Lori Pope + Alyssa Degnan6551% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chrissa Matthews
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Sally Starling
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Reiko Kretz
43W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cathy Traver
3W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Julea Hovey
33W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Kathleen Rogerson
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Angela Magnuson
81W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Keisha Uhle
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Lori Pope
80W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Diane Harrison
134W–82L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Brooke Homan
69W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Alyssa Degnan
59W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Donna Edwards
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.