Teams

Kimi 7.0 - 1

2024 Mixed 40 and Over League · 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-31vs Kimi 7.0 - 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesDon Kevin Dela Cruz / Kimiona Watkins vs Mac Rivera / Darnella Villanueva6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMark Chun / Marianne Takamiya vs Britta Zimmer-Long / Adam Long7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Mei Ceria vs Anthony Ballinger / Shirley Saribay4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-15vs Game Set LunchWon 21
W#1 DoublesRiley Ceria / Lori Kamimura vs Dave Okamura / Myra Hironaga6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDon Kevin Dela Cruz / Mei Ceria vs Kelvin Nishiura / Noriko Kobayashi6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLori Nekoba / RYAN OKAMURA vs Nolan Yamaki / Lynn Hatada6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-13vs Double WhammyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSatoshi Tanaka / Lori Kamimura vs Dean Takebayashi / Hanna Wilson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRiley Ceria / Mei Ceria vs Michael Marshall / Charlene Pascual6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGwen Tanaka / RYAN OKAMURA vs Valerie Galacgac / Paul Brotzman6-0, 6-1
2024-07-06vs Double WhammyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Chun / Marianne Takamiya vs Grant Nishida / Valerie Galacgac6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRiley Ceria / Mei Ceria vs Lester Oshiro / Rebecca Marshall6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSatoshi Tanaka / Gwen Tanaka vs David Fuselier / Marleen Cabarloc6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Kimi 7.0 - 2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Chrissy Capati vs Britta Zimmer-Long / Adam Long4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Nekoba / RYAN OKAMURA vs Anthony Ballinger / Darnella Villanueva3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDon Kevin Dela Cruz / Kimiona Watkins vs Thomas Belcher / Savery Kann6-1, 6-2
2024-06-10vs Game Set LunchWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Chun / Marianne Takamiya vs Dave Okamura / Michele Lefebvre6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Gwen Tanaka vs Jonathan Aronce / Noriko Kobayashi2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSatoshi Tanaka / Chrissy Capati vs Brian Koge / Lynn Hatada6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kimi 7.0 - 15113513101
2Kimi 7.0 - 25113514129
3Double Whammy2471124176
4Game Set Lunch0631532205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Lori Nekoba
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Satoshi Tanaka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Keith Kunimoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.39
Marianne Takamiya
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Lori Kamimura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Riley Ceria
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Mark Chun
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Kimiona Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Gwen Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Chrissy Capati
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Mei Ceria
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
RYAN OKAMURA
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Don Kevin Dela Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Kunimoto + Kimiona Watkins5086% games+22.5% vs expected
Riley Ceria + Mei Ceria16467% games+19.8% vs expected
Keith Kunimoto + Gwen Tanaka4255% games+14.2% vs expected
RYAN OKAMURA + Mei Ceria3458% games+9.2% vs expected
Mark Chun + Marianne Takamiya9655% games+2.7% vs expected
Don Kevin Dela Cruz + Kimiona Watkins404 matchesnot enough data
Don Kevin Dela Cruz + Mei Ceria314 matchesnot enough data
Keith Kunimoto + Lori Kamimura213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lori Nekoba
83W–96L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Satoshi Tanaka
44W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.56
3.5
Keith Kunimoto
149W–86L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Marianne Takamiya
86W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Lori Kamimura
30W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Riley Ceria
94W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Mark Chun
42W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Kimiona Watkins
179W–109L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Gwen Tanaka
88W–51L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Chrissy Capati
40W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Mei Ceria
92W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
RYAN OKAMURA
56W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Don Kevin Dela Cruz
50W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.