Teams

UPTA18S/CLAY/THORNBLADE

2025 UPTA Singles 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Singles Women - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-15vs UPTA18S/Bieber/HollyTreeWon 21
L#1 SinglesPatricia Gailey vs Michelle Sykes0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKathleen Hull vs Maren Mueller6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKeri McGrath vs Lindsey Culler6-1, 6-2
2025-10-08vs UPTA18S/Bieber/HollyTreeWon 21
L#1 SinglesKathleen Hull vs Natalie Bieber0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Christian vs Lindsey Culler6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrantley Goforth vs Melanie Greene6-3, 6-1
2025-10-01vs UPTA18S/Bieber/HollyTreeWon 20
W#2 SinglesMegan Christian vs Michelle Sykes2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesPatricia Gailey vs Leslie Waltz5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-25vs UPTA18S/Bieber/HollyTreeSplit 11
L#2 SinglesEmily Oglesby vs Melanie Greene0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBrantley Goforth vs Lindsey Culler6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Brantley Goforth
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.53
Kathleen Hull
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.47
Megan Christian
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Patricia Gailey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.36
Keri McGrath
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Emily Oglesby
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Gailey + Megan Christian18859% games+12.2% vs expected
Patricia Gailey + Kathleen Hull6064% games+11.1% vs expected
Kathleen Hull + Keri McGrath4155% games+4.8% vs expected
Patricia Gailey + Keri McGrath4160% gamesnot enough data
Megan Christian + Keri McGrath224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brantley Goforth
63W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Kathleen Hull
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Megan Christian
37W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Patricia Gailey
58W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Keri McGrath
46W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Emily Oglesby
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.