Teams

UPTA18S/Bieber/HollyTree

2025 UPTA Singles 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Singles Women - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-15vs UPTA18S/CLAY/THORNBLADELost 12
W#1 SinglesMichelle Sykes vs Patricia Gailey6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMaren Mueller vs Kathleen Hull0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLindsey Culler vs Keri McGrath1-6, 2-6
2025-10-08vs UPTA18S/CLAY/THORNBLADELost 12
W#1 SinglesNatalie Bieber vs Kathleen Hull6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLindsey Culler vs Megan Christian2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMelanie Greene vs Brantley Goforth3-6, 1-6
2025-10-01vs UPTA18S/CLAY/THORNBLADELost 12
W#1 SinglesNatalie Bieber vs Kelly Clay5-7, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Sykes vs Megan Christian6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLeslie Waltz vs Patricia Gailey7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-25vs UPTA18S/CLAY/THORNBLADELost 12
L#1 SinglesMichelle Sykes vs Kelly Clay4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMelanie Greene vs Emily Oglesby6-0, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLindsey Culler vs Brantley Goforth1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Natalie Bieber
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Michelle Sykes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.64
Maren Mueller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.58
Leslie Waltz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Melanie Greene
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.18
Lindsey Culler
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maren Mueller + Leslie Waltz4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Bieber
39W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Michelle Sykes
54W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Maren Mueller
28W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Leslie Waltz
57W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Melanie Greene
14W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Lindsey Culler
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.