Teams

LCTA18/PERNELL/MPR

2022 STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-30vs LCTA18/Gardner/creeksideLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetsy Hopkins / Kellyanne Dix vs Holly Gardner / Lauren Pogrob3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Vanessa Hinson
published
3.47
Valerie Mehta
published
3.46
Rhonda Ozor
published
3.39
Jennifer Keith
published
3.38
Kellyanne Dix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Maggie Voelkel
published
3.29
3.29
Kimber Wiggins
published
3.23
Diane Pernell
published 3.5
2.99
Andrea Harrison
published 3.5
2.83
Jaclyn Cook
published 3
2.80
Lisa Lasko
published
Kim Shaw
published
Kristen Clark
published
Sara Tuorto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimber Wiggins + Stephanie Sutherland7254% games+6.4% vs expected
Kimber Wiggins + Vanessa Hinson2439% games−6.7% vs expected
Valerie Mehta + Jaclyn Cook224 matchesnot enough data
Kellyanne Dix + Kristen Clark033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vanessa Hinson
33W–71L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Valerie Mehta
123W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
Rhonda Ozor
82W–75L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jennifer Keith
101W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kellyanne Dix
47W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Maggie Voelkel
37W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Stephanie Sutherland
89W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Kimber Wiggins
98W–66L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Diane Pernell
53W–33L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Andrea Harrison
33W–81L career · type A · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Jaclyn Cook
54W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
Lisa Lasko
32W–39L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Kim Shaw
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristen Clark
22W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Tuorto
30W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.