Teams

MC ORANGE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-12vs APR-U REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Seeton / Paul Curtin vs Sergio Blumenblat / Val Bardash2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJamie Harvey / Dean Ogawa vs Jeffrey Merman / Ernesto Montenegro5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Stephen Herrera vs Dan Daly / Richard Funk4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-05vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDan Parker / Dean Ogawa vs Gary Bland / Dan Bottinelli1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Valenciano / Tom Seeton vs Mike Stewart / Gary Ashley6-2, 6-2
2024-05-29vs LTFC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Harvey / Dean Ogawa vs Mark Shively / John Latta3-6, 1-6
2024-05-22vs KC-CC REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesJamie Harvey / Tom Seeton vs Lance Willoughby / Alan Harris6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Herrera / David Archuleta vs Larry Hay / Howard McGee6-0, 6-1
2024-05-08vs APR-U REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Seeton / David Valenciano vs Sergio Blumenblat / Val Bardash1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Stephen Herrera vs Jeffrey Merman / Mark Anderson2-6, 2-6
2024-05-01vs NJ REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesFrank Rimlinger / Tom Seeton vs Greg Olson / William Skelton4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Paul Curtin
published
2.79
Tom Seeton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Dan Parker
published 3
2.74
Jamie Harvey
published
2.71
Frank Rimlinger
published
2.66
Dean Ogawa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
David Archuleta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.44
David Valenciano
published 2.5
Stephen Herrera
published
WILLIAM HITCHCOCK
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Ogawa + David Archuleta2450% gamesnot enough data
Dean Ogawa + Tom Seeton0533% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Herrera + David Archuleta123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Curtin
43W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Tom Seeton
58W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dan Parker
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jamie Harvey
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Frank Rimlinger
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Dean Ogawa
50W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
David Archuleta
36W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
David Valenciano
8W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%66%34%
2.44
Stephen Herrera
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
WILLIAM HITCHCOCK
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.