Teams

LTFC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-19vs APR-U REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGeoffrey Walser / Mark Shively vs Dan Daly / Jeffrey Merman1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Latta / Kevin Gilson vs Ernesto Montenegro / Richard Funk6-0, 6-3
2024-06-05vs KC-CC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesReed Haddock / Mark Shively vs Randy Rosenburg / Lance Willoughby6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Gilson / Gordon Carpenter vs Alan Harris / Gary Farmar4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Smith / John Latta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-29vs MC ORANGEWon 20
W#2 DoublesMark Shively / John Latta vs Jamie Harvey / Dean Ogawa6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRonald Sprague / Kevin Gilson vs Frank Rimlinger / David Valenciano6-0, 6-3
2024-05-22vs APR-U REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesReed Haddock / Gordon Carpenter vs Mark Anderson / Hunter Clark1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRonald Sprague / Kevin Gilson vs Jeffrey Merman / Ernesto Montenegro7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeoffrey Walser / Richard Foster vs Dan Daly / Donald Oswald6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-15vs NJ REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesReed Haddock / John Latta vs James Burton / William Skelton5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Gilson / Geoffrey Walser vs Dan Bottinelli / Mike Stewart3-6, 0-6
2024-05-01vs KC-CC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Shively / Reed Haddock vs Randy Rosenburg / Jim Riley6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGordon Carpenter / Geoffrey Walser vs Larry Hay / Howard McGee7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
John Latta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Reed Haddock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Kevin Gilson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.34
Geoffrey Walser
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Gordon Carpenter
published
Mark Shively
published
Richard Foster
published
Ronald Sprague
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reed Haddock + John Latta121349% gamesnot enough data
Geoffrey Walser + John Latta14757% gamesnot enough data
John Latta + Kevin Gilson3450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
John Latta
99W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Reed Haddock
77W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Kevin Gilson
27W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Geoffrey Walser
38W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.34
Gordon Carpenter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Shively
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Foster
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronald Sprague
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.