Teams

Team 2 Unstrung Heroes

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-16vs Team 1 HopkinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPaul Reid / Mikhail Velasco vs Tim Bowes / KEVIN CUMMINGS2-6, 5-5
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Chungchi Yao vs Jim Craig / Patrick Gardner6-4, 6-0
2024-03-01vs Team 9 CarvajalLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Pickering / Majed Hamawy vs Eric Kinne / Christopher Damboise6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-25vs Team 6 Full Metal RacketWon 10
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Gary Lawson vs Mark Herrington / Leonel Robles1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-17vs Team 7 WGCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesChungchi Yao / Christopher Dopita vs Jay Ghazal / Randy Sidhu6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / WALTER Becklund vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-12vs Team 8 RBGCC 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Christopher Dopita vs James Colucci / John DeMoors7-5, 6-0
2024-02-04vs Team 4 Backhand BanditsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Reid / Chungchi Yao vs Juan Salazar / Nobuyasu Sugimoto4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-01-20vs Team 5 CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Mikhail Velasco vs Robert Chang / Andrew Tsai4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChungchi Yao / WALTER Becklund vs Alex Bittner / Ilya Shapiro5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.81
Craig Clayton
published 3
2.75
Chungchi Yao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Paul Reid
published
2.69
Mikhail Velasco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Rob Wright
published
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
2.48
Craig Pickering
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Chungchi Yao141152% games−6.8% vs expected
Chungchi Yao + Raymond Barry134 matchesnot enough data
Chungchi Yao + Mikhail Velasco213 matchesnot enough data
Rob Wright + Craig Pickering123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Craig Clayton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Chungchi Yao
77W–97L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Paul Reid
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.69
Rob Wright
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
2.63
Raymond Barry
2W–16L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Craig Pickering
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.