Teams

Team 1 Hopkins

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-16vs Team 2 Unstrung HeroesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJamie Holloman / Eric Hopkins vs Raymond Barry / Kurt Schinnerer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTim Bowes / KEVIN CUMMINGS vs Paul Reid / Mikhail Velasco6-2, 5-5
2024-03-09vs Team 3 Ageless All StarsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Bowes / Jamie Holloman vs Mark Jenkins / James Knowles6-2, 3-5
2024-02-24vs Team 7 WGCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesTim Bowes / Christopher Wulff vs Geoffrey Balleisen / Rod Volz1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-02-19vs Team 8 RBGCC 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Holloman / Galip Karabulut vs Sohale Razmjou / Brian Whitaker - (DQ)*2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim Bowes / KEVIN CUMMINGS vs Emil Valle / Ali Ghatri2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesTim Bowes / Eric Hopkins vs David Schwartz / Robert MacK6-0, 6-0
2024-02-03vs Team 5 CourtmastersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJamie Holloman / Galip Karabulut vs Robert Chang / Quan Vu6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTim Bowes / Patrick Gardner vs Alberto Zapata / Alex Bittner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-01-27vs Team 4 Backhand BanditsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Bowes / KEVIN CUMMINGS vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto / Keiichi Nakatani6-4, 6-4
2024-01-17vs Team 6 Full Metal RacketWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Holloman / Tim Bowes vs Mark Herrington / Mark Neely6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jamie Holloman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.10
Galip Karabulut
published
2.75
Tim Bowes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.69
Jim Craig
published
2.62
Patrick Gardner
published
2.60
Samuel Meadema
published
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
published
2.09
Christopher Wulff
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Hopkins + Jamie Holloman4165% games+9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Holloman
62W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Galip Karabulut
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Tim Bowes
34W–35L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Jim Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Patrick Gardner
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Samuel Meadema
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Christopher Wulff
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.