Teams

Western: Advantageous

2024 18&Over Women · 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 2.80 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-23vs StilesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoan Arno / Jenny Murphy vs Michelle Stiles / Josephine Anthony6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Wood vs Ivy Raines6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Mone / Linda Cavallaro vs Rose Sweeney / Laurie Panto6-0, 6-2
2024-07-16vs StilesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Farella / Joan Arno vs Michelle Stiles / Shelley Smith3-6, 6-7
2024-07-09vs StilesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Farella / Lori Miller vs Michelle Stiles / Linda Breckheimer5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Snyder vs Nicole Adsitt6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Arno / Valerie Mone vs Amy LaVaute / Ellen Furnari6-0, 6-2
2024-07-02vs StilesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Gelman / Debora Millson vs Shelley Smith / Nicole Adsitt6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJen Modesti vs Josephine Anthony7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Cavallaro / Josie Stephenson vs Sarah Towsley / Laurie Panto6-1, 6-4
2024-06-26vs StilesWon 30
W#1 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Anne Farella vs Lisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons / Shelley Smith4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJen Modesti vs Nicole Adsitt6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Smith / Josie Stephenson vs Ivy Raines / Ellen Furnari6-1, 6-2
2024-06-25vs StilesLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Snyder / Melissa Gelman vs Michelle Stiles / Laurie Panto6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHeather Wood vs Catherine Faruolo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Miller / Andrea Riccelli vs Amy LaVaute / Linda Breckheimer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-12vs StilesLost 02
L#1 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Lori Miller vs Wendy Campbell / Catherine Faruolo3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Mone / Leila Gungor vs Rose Sweeney / Ellen Furnari4-6, 4-6
2024-06-05vs StilesWon 30
W#1 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Josie Stephenson vs Ivy Raines / Jennifer Cline6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHeather Wood vs Josephine Anthony6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJen Modesti / Andrea Riccelli vs Laurie Panto / Reeby Kirane6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Advantageous5316817154
2Stiles3581637260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Karen Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Valerie Mone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Debora Millson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Josie Stephenson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Anne Farella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Heather Wood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.43
Chantra Bonomo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.34
Melissa Gelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Lori Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Jen Modesti
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Virginia Trobert
published
2.10
Carol Sluis
published 2.5
2.07
Joan Arno
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.94
Leila Gungor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Linda Cavallaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Farella + Chantra Bonomo6261% games+10.3% vs expected
Carol Sluis + Lori Miller2342% gamesnot enough data
Anne Farella + Joan Arno213 matchesnot enough data
Anne Farella + Lori Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Gelman + Valerie Mone213 matchesnot enough data
Josie Stephenson + Valerie Mone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Snyder
42W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
Valerie Mone
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Debora Millson
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Josie Stephenson
20W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
2.57
3
Anne Farella
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Heather Wood
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
Chantra Bonomo
25W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%71%29%
2.43
Melissa Gelman
19W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.34
Lori Miller
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
Jen Modesti
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Virginia Trobert
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Carol Sluis
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Joan Arno
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Leila Gungor
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Linda Cavallaro
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Michelle Smith
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.