Teams

Stiles

2024 18&Over Women · 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-23vs Western: AdvantageousLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Stiles / Josephine Anthony vs Joan Arno / Jenny Murphy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIvy Raines vs Heather Wood0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRose Sweeney / Laurie Panto vs Valerie Mone / Linda Cavallaro0-6, 2-6
2024-07-16vs Western: AdvantageousWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Stiles / Shelley Smith vs Anne Farella / Joan Arno6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJosephine Anthony vs Andrea Riccelli4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Campbell / Nicole Adsitt vs Michelle Smith / Jenny Murphy1-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs Western: AdvantageousLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Stiles / Linda Breckheimer vs Anne Farella / Lori Miller7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Adsitt vs Karen Snyder0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy LaVaute / Ellen Furnari vs Joan Arno / Valerie Mone0-6, 2-6
2024-07-02vs Western: AdvantageousLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelley Smith / Nicole Adsitt vs Melissa Gelman / Debora Millson3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJosephine Anthony vs Jen Modesti6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Towsley / Laurie Panto vs Linda Cavallaro / Josie Stephenson1-6, 4-6
2024-06-26vs Western: AdvantageousLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons / Shelley Smith vs Chantra Bonomo / Anne Farella6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Adsitt vs Jen Modesti1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIvy Raines / Ellen Furnari vs Michelle Smith / Josie Stephenson1-6, 2-6
2024-06-25vs Western: AdvantageousSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Stiles / Laurie Panto vs Karen Snyder / Melissa Gelman2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy LaVaute / Linda Breckheimer vs Lori Miller / Andrea Riccelli6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs Western: AdvantageousWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Campbell / Catherine Faruolo vs Chantra Bonomo / Lori Miller6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Adsitt vs Michelle Smith1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRose Sweeney / Ellen Furnari vs Valerie Mone / Leila Gungor6-4, 6-4
2024-06-05vs Western: AdvantageousLost 03
L#1 DoublesIvy Raines / Jennifer Cline vs Chantra Bonomo / Josie Stephenson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJosephine Anthony vs Heather Wood4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Panto / Reeby Kirane vs Jen Modesti / Andrea Riccelli1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Advantageous5316817154
2Stiles3581637260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Michelle Stiles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Shelley Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Ellen Furnari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Ivy Raines
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.28
Linda Breckheimer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Amy LaVaute
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Josephine Anthony
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Reeby Kirane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Lisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.10
Nicole Adsitt
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.91
Laurie Panto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rose Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Panto + Rose Sweeney033 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Panto + Amy LaVaute123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Stiles + Nicole Adsitt123 matchesnot enough data
Ivy Raines + Ellen Furnari123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Stiles
19W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Shelley Smith
23W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
Ellen Furnari
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%69%31%
2.43
Ivy Raines
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
Linda Breckheimer
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Amy LaVaute
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Josephine Anthony
8W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.25
Reeby Kirane
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
Lisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Nicole Adsitt
3W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Laurie Panto
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Rose Sweeney
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Campbell
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.