Teams

PHX/Korbin/18&O/M/MidTri

2026 SPR TRI-Level · Mid 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Mid 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jaquess000000
2Barnhart000000
3PHX/Korbin/18&O/M/MidTri000000
4Bernal000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Josue Tovar
published
4.37
Shi Jin
published
4.33
Christopher DeRosa
published 4.5
3.98
Rob Leinbach
published 4
3.94
Matthew Jackson
published
3.82
William Korbin
published
3.58
Nathan Brelsford
published
3.54
Jaskaran Bhogal
published
3.49
Nathan Rowland
published
3.48
Joshua Grabel
published
3.39
Jourdan Norman
published
Jared Williams
published
Trent Calleja
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Leinbach + Matthew Jackson9359% games+6.2% vs expected
Nathan Brelsford + Matthew Jackson6166% gamesnot enough data
Christopher DeRosa + Shi Jin6066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josue Tovar
47W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
Shi Jin
23W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Christopher DeRosa
59W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.33
4
Rob Leinbach
112W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Matthew Jackson
112W–48L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.94
William Korbin
91W–26L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Nathan Brelsford
53W–34L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jaskaran Bhogal
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Nathan Rowland
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Joshua Grabel
107W–69L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
Jourdan Norman
35W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jared Williams
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Trent Calleja
45W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.