Teams

Barnhart

2026 SPR TRI-Level · Mid 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Mid 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jaquess000000
2Barnhart000000
3PHX/Korbin/18&O/M/MidTri000000
4Bernal000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Kevin Tuhy
published
4.13
Brian Wong
published 4.5
4.07
Aditya Sharma
published 4.5
4.00
Robert Keil
published
3.93
Luke Rush
published
3.85
Brendan Pensis
published 4
3.75
Jeremy Barnhart
published
3.57
Rudy Dudebout
published
3.45
Glenn Stutz
published 3.5
3.45
Scott van Vleet
published
3.30
Mark Doseck
published
Jonathan Friedman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Tuhy + Aditya Sharma11556% games+10.8% vs expected
Jonathan Friedman + Jeremy Barnhart9262% games+8.3% vs expected
Kevin Tuhy + Jonathan Friedman5357% games+6.2% vs expected
Brendan Pensis + Jeremy Barnhart4746% games−4.5% vs expected
Kevin Tuhy + Jeremy Barnhart4156% gamesnot enough data
Brendan Pensis + Aditya Sharma314 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Barnhart + Brian Wong314 matchesnot enough data
Aditya Sharma + Brian Wong224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Tuhy
110W–81L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Brian Wong
36W–34L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Aditya Sharma
141W–99L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
Robert Keil
90W–41L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Luke Rush
50W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Brendan Pensis
77W–61L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jeremy Barnhart
91W–72L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Rudy Dudebout
115W–83L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Glenn Stutz
61W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Scott van Vleet
97W–104L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Mark Doseck
41W–53L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Jonathan Friedman
29W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.