Teams

Summers

2026 Mixed 40&over-NE · 4.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-06vs LindseyWon 20
W#1 DoublesTabitha Pitts / Brian Quinn vs Jamie Lindsey / Ashley McLellan6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJaime Summers / Brent Waldrop vs Judy Bumgardner / Kevin Abel6-4, 6-1
2026-06-29vs LindseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesGlenn Summers / Amanda Howell vs Jamie Lindsey / Judy Bumgardner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrent Waldrop / Tabitha Pitts vs John Benjamin / Sheila Matthews7-6, 6-2
2026-06-14vs LindseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaime Summers / Brian Quinn vs Kevin Abel / Judy Bumgardner6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Waldrop / Misty Stricklin vs Brad Clayton / Ashley McLellan6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCandace Browning / Glenn Barker vs Jamie Lindsey / Susanne Lindsey2-6, 2-6
2026-06-09vs LindseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCandace Browning / Brian Quinn vs Roger Huey / Sheila Matthews6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGlenn Barker / Caitlin Thomas vs Brad Clayton / Judy Bumgardner6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJustin Waldrop / Misty Stricklin vs Jamie Lindsey / Ashley McLellan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Summers40102472
2Lindsey0421021136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Brian Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Justin Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Caitlin Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Tabitha Pitts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Amanda Howell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Jaime Summers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Misty Stricklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Brent Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Candace Browning
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Glenn Barker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Glenn Summers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Quinn
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Justin Waldrop
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
4
Caitlin Thomas
25W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Tabitha Pitts
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Amanda Howell
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jaime Summers
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Misty Stricklin
24W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3.5
Brent Waldrop
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
4
Candace Browning
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
Glenn Barker
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Glenn Summers
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.