Teams

CDTA E M55&O 8.0X MT Bann Foss Sat 4 $25

CDTA ESL Mixed 55 & Over · CDTA ESL Mixed 55&Over 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesRichard Foss / Elisa Zusman vs Cliff Breslow / Laurie Sandman0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Strickley / Rosemary Wheeler vs Stephen Ewaldz / Priscilla Ewaldz3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRichard Foss / Jody Sternberg vs Cliff Breslow / Laurie Sandman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Strickley / Debra Feldman vs Howard Braun / Rita Eichner4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesRosemary Wheeler / William Strickley vs Julie Alexander / Howard Braun1-0, 0-0
L#2 DoublesElisa Zusman / Richard Foss vs Priscilla Ewaldz / Stephen Ewaldz2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CDTA ESL Mixed 55&Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E M55&O 8.0X MT Bann Ewaldz Sat 6 $252661836239
2CDTA E M55&O 8.0X MT Bann Foss Sat 4 $251712346276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Rochelle Meng
published 4
3.29
Rosemary Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Elisa Zusman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Richard Foss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
William Strickley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Jody Sternberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Debra Feldman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Mesirow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisa Zusman + Richard Foss4447% games−8.2% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + William Strickley033 matchesnot enough data
Rosemary Wheeler + William Strickley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rochelle Meng
184W–198L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Rosemary Wheeler
162W–147L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Elisa Zusman
172W–142L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Richard Foss
65W–116L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
William Strickley
116W–134L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Jody Sternberg
85W–76L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Debra Feldman
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Steve Mesirow
7W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.