Teams

Team 4 Fun Bunch

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesDavid Viar / Rohit Munjal vs Robert Harland / Anass Anouch7-5, 1-2
2024-09-08vs Team 6 Z's Last Chance SaloonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Sendich / Stephen Gotts vs Anthony Chang / Doan Nguyen1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-31vs Team 5 MaddiWon 10
W#3 DoublesRohit Munjal / Stephen Gotts vs Michael Fromer / Shanmuganathan Arumugam6-0, 6-1
2024-08-28vs Team 8 Stringing WinnersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Sendich / Rohit Munjal vs Mike Ly / Tan Nguyen6-0, 7-5
2024-08-19vs Team 7 ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesRohit Munjal / Arnel Majillo vs Biao Yang / Frank Pan6-2, 6-1
2024-08-05vs Team 4 WolvesWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Gotts / Marc Sendich vs Jay Colella / Kai Yu6-2, 6-2
2024-08-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Viar / Marc Sendich vs Noah Motz / Randy Atkins6-2, 6-1
2024-08-02vs Team 7 ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesRohit Munjal / Arnel Majillo vs Jason Pallady / Biao Yang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Nicholas Lim
published
Stephen Bittner
published 4.5
4.18
Kenneth Fowler
published
4.17
Bob White
published 4.5
3.81
Eric Ottenheimer
published 4
3.80
Alan Ogilvie
published 4
3.68
David Viar
published 3.5
3.47
Marc Sendich
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Rohit Munjal
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Matt Morgan
published
Stephen Gotts
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Will Jenkins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Lim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.61
4.5
Stephen Bittner
46W–44L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth Fowler
56W–30L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Bob White
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Eric Ottenheimer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Alan Ogilvie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
David Viar
39W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.68
3.5
Marc Sendich
109W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Rohit Munjal
151W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Morgan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Gotts
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Will Jenkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.