Teams

MITC:Foley:Olney

2026 NH Tri Level-Summer · Women 4.0 1

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-01vs SC:Conroy:CropperLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Foley / Jodine Taylor vs Catherine Sherman / Karin Conroy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-25vs LNH:MayeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackeline Olney / Lisa Foley vs Beth Kreick / Michelle Braasch1-6, 2-6
2026-08-11vs SC:Conroy:CropperLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodine Taylor / Elizabeth Gordon vs Joanne Schwope / Catherine Sherman3-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs LNH:MayeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackeline Olney / Elizabeth Gordon vs Hillary Maye / Michelle Braasch6-7, 4-6
2026-07-21vs SC:Conroy:CropperLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Foley / Jodine Taylor vs Joanne Schwope / Karin Conroy5-7, 4-6
2026-07-14vs LNH:MayeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackeline Olney / Elizabeth Gordon vs Beth Kreick / Michelle Braasch2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC:Conroy:Cropper0440127
2LNH:Maye0422435
3MITC:Foley:Olney0404850

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jodine Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Jackeline Olney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Lisa Foley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Elizabeth Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodine Taylor + Jackeline Olney10364% games+8.3% vs expected
Jodine Taylor + Lisa Foley4553% games−4.3% vs expected
Lisa Foley + Jackeline Olney4740% games−9.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Gordon + Jackeline Olney6649% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodine Taylor
51W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Jackeline Olney
67W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lisa Foley
77W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Elizabeth Gordon
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.