Teams

LNH:Maye

2026 NH Tri Level-Summer · Women 4.0 1

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs MITC:Foley:OlneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kreick / Michelle Braasch vs Jackeline Olney / Lisa Foley6-1, 6-2
2026-08-18vs SC:Conroy:CropperLost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Maye / Beth Kreick vs Sarah Cropper / Joanne Schwope0-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs MITC:Foley:OlneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesHillary Maye / Michelle Braasch vs Jackeline Olney / Elizabeth Gordon7-6, 6-4
2026-07-28vs SC:Conroy:CropperLost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Maye / Michelle Braasch vs Sarah Cropper / Karin Conroy5-7, 3-6
2026-07-14vs MITC:Foley:OlneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kreick / Michelle Braasch vs Jackeline Olney / Elizabeth Gordon6-2, 6-1
2026-07-09vs SC:Conroy:CropperLost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Maye / Michelle Braasch vs Sarah Cropper / Catherine Sherman6-2, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC:Conroy:Cropper0440127
2LNH:Maye0422435
3MITC:Foley:Olney0404850

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Beth Kreick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Michelle Braasch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Hillary Maye
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Braasch + Hillary Maye24959% games+9.9% vs expected
Beth Kreick + Hillary Maye6258% games+2.7% vs expected
Beth Kreick + Michelle Braasch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Kreick
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Michelle Braasch
71W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Hillary Maye
113W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.