Teams

Crosstown Connection

Tri-Level · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacob Braun / Brett Felton vs Christopher Strahler / Patrick Stewart6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacob Braun / Daniel Craig vs Karl Haider / Christopher Strahler3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Miklavic / Jacob Braun vs Aashish Jog / Tim Lloyd7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Bummer / Jacob Braun vs Patrick Stewart / Christopher Strahler6-2, 7-5
2021-12-26vs Crosstown Connection TooWon 20
W#1 DoublesDominic Costa / Matthew Paat vs Ryan Abel / Charles Orr5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Meyn / Robert Ford vs Kurran Singh / Ryan Dansak6-3, 6-0
2021-12-19vs Crosstown Connection TooWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathan Wang / Zachary Pivirotto vs Ryan Dansak / Christopher Woods6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJacob Braun / Chris Proud vs Brian Miklavic / Richard Ting4-6, 6-4, 6-2
2021-11-28vs Crosstown Connection TooWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Dwornick / Dominic Costa vs Charles Orr / Christopher Woods6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Katz / Robert Ford vs Kurran Singh / John Wood6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Proud / Jacob Braun vs Richard Ting / Anthony Aliano6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Zachary Pivirotto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
David Dwornick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Matthew Paat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Jonathan Meyn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Dominic Costa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jacob Braun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Robert Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominic Costa + David Dwornick8555% games−4.5% vs expected
Jonathan Meyn + Robert Ford404 matchesnot enough data
Dominic Costa + Robert Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Pivirotto + David Dwornick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Pivirotto
51W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%84%15%
4.37
4.5
David Dwornick
56W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Matthew Paat
66W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Jonathan Meyn
66W–54L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.06
4.5
Dominic Costa
115W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Jacob Braun
71W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Ford
109W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.