Teams

deOliva

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-20vs Branco/SchedlerWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Kristine Janik vs Christine Branco / Beth Looney6-2, 6-0
2025-05-13vs BRINGARDWon 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Senter vs Beth Hedgepeth6-6
2025-05-08vs Murray 3.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Senter / Kristine Janik vs Dorothy Crumpton / Diane Gentry6-1, 7-5
2025-05-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Senter vs Amanda Mason3-1
2025-04-10vs Thompkins/AntonelliWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Janik / Heather Senter vs Carol Rodriguez / Juliana Mastroserio6-0, 6-1
2025-04-08vs Epperly PNCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Senter / Kristine Janik vs Tara Duckworth / Elizabeth Fenton4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-25vs Davidson 3.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Senter / Kristine Janik vs Stacey Johnson / Dawn Heatwole6-0, 6-1
2025-03-18vs McAdams/Miller DAYWon 31
W#1 DoublesPati DeOliva / Stacie Williams vs Jan Best / Cindy Worden6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHolly Dameron vs Donna Beaman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Weddle / Cara Foucht vs Ann McAdams / Amy Sweyer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Ferree / Stephanie Farrell vs Allison McWhorter / Wendy McElhinney6-1, 6-4
2025-03-13vs Morgan Spring 40-3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Senter / Kristine Janik vs Kristina Marchisin / Joelle Crocker6-3, 6-2
2025-03-09vs Kosh Spring 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Janik / Heather Senter vs Vickie Kosh / Autumn Correnti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Julia Mattingly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Cara Foucht
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Sue Fuller
published
3.40
Kristine Janik
published
3.40
Stephanie Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Heather Senter
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Stacie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Katie Ferree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Holly Dameron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Pati DeOliva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Evelyn Foster
published 3.5
3.15
Heather Weddle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Windy Pigford
published
3.00
Leslie Pickens
published
2.65
Alexis Wall
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pati DeOliva + Stacie Williams4548% games+7.9% vs expected
Heather Weddle + Julia Mattingly3357% games+5.8% vs expected
Stacie Williams + Stephanie Farrell134 matchesnot enough data
Katie Ferree + Leslie Pickens314 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Wall + Leslie Pickens123 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Foster + Julia Mattingly303 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Foster + Holly Dameron123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Weddle + Sue Fuller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Mattingly
59W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Cara Foucht
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Sue Fuller
26W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kristine Janik
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Stephanie Farrell
43W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Heather Senter
245W–167L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Stacie Williams
40W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Katie Ferree
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Holly Dameron
33W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Pati DeOliva
27W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Evelyn Foster
28W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Heather Weddle
31W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Windy Pigford
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Leslie Pickens
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Alexis Wall
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.