Teams

ATC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs LTFC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Silvina Sansot vs Ashley Agrelius / Courtney Ring6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Melissa Blake6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCynthia Rentz / Suzanne MacKenzie vs Nancy Brooks / Tracy Bourque3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Katie Ozimek vs Ashley Gonzales / Brandi Renick-Smith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-19vs SSH ORANGEWon 31
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Leonard / Kendal Mullins vs Lauren Burney / Mary Logan6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Brenda Findley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Trujillo / Bobbie Brandon vs Ann Baldwin / Barbara Hall6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Suzanne MacKenzie vs Shari Procopio / Cynthia MacE Sullivan6-1, 6-2
2021-07-05vs SKY REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKendal Mullins / Elizabeth Leonard vs Annie Humphrey / Tori Hutchens0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Vicki Devine6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Madelaine Osborne vs Jennifer Urbonas / Christy Jones7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Cynthia Rentz vs Doris Pearson / Jennifer Lester6-3, 6-4
2021-06-28vs HG REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Elizabeth Leonard vs Nicole Nies / Kristin Morris2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Julie Garside6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Cynthia Rentz vs Paige Jones / Julie Sanders6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Mary Trujillo vs Clare Ambrose / Sandra Stephenson6-4, 6-1
2021-06-21vs GCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Kendal Mullins vs Keli Loehr / Betsy Phillips3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Jamie Harris3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Rentz / Jane Doe vs Lisa Adams / Heidi Wolfe6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Trujillo / Cathryn Sheldon vs Jennifer Steelman / Kristen Abell6-7, 3-6
2021-06-14vs GAC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Leonard / Silvina Sansot vs Candace Harris / Suzie Erzinger6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Cynthia Rentz vs Tanya Maierhofer / Suzanne Martinek3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Mary Trujillo vs Maria Angela Lutterbach / Carol Thornock4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-07vs CACM GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Leonard / Kendal Mullins vs Amy Abalos / Liza Butterfield4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Nancy Hallowell6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Silvina Sansot vs Mary Murray / Kay Roesch1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Cathryn Sheldon vs Robin Ashmore-Guin / Sonja Russell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Silvina Sansot
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cathryn Sheldon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ginna Halverson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Elizabeth Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Mary Trujillo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Kendal Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Bobbie Brandon
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Suzanne MacKenzie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Cynthia Rentz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Katie Ozimek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Madelaine Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Silvina Sansot + Mary Trujillo111453% games+4.1% vs expected
Bobbie Brandon + Mary Trujillo8648% games−1.2% vs expected
Katie Ozimek + Silvina Sansot3255% games−2.0% vs expected
Bobbie Brandon + Cathryn Sheldon2351% games−2.1% vs expected
Kendal Mullins + Elizabeth Leonard91248% games−5.5% vs expected
Bobbie Brandon + Silvina Sansot044 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne MacKenzie + Madelaine Osborne134 matchesnot enough data
Madelaine Osborne + Silvina Sansot314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Silvina Sansot
38W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cathryn Sheldon
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ginna Halverson
14W–3L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Leonard
39W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Mary Trujillo
37W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kendal Mullins
24W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Bobbie Brandon
24W–42L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Suzanne MacKenzie
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Cynthia Rentz
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katie Ozimek
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Madelaine Osborne
13W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.