Teams

SKY RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs GAC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesTori Hutchens / Annie Humphrey vs Carrie Raben / Lynelle Zabel6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Muller / Julie Bock vs Marli Davis / Suzie Erzinger6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Urbonas / Jennifer Lester vs Marcy Yonker / Maria Angela Lutterbach7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-12vs SSH ORANGEWon 31
L#1 DoublesAnnie Humphrey / Julie Bock vs Lauren Burney / Mary Logan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Muller vs Ann Baldwin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoris Pearson / Vicki Devine vs Barbara Hall / Cindy Legrand6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTori Hutchens / Jennifer Lester vs Cynthia MacE Sullivan / Shari Procopio6-1, 6-2
2021-07-05vs ATC GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesAnnie Humphrey / Tori Hutchens vs Kendal Mullins / Elizabeth Leonard6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesVicki Devine vs Ginna Halverson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Urbonas / Christy Jones vs Silvina Sansot / Madelaine Osborne6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDoris Pearson / Jennifer Lester vs Bobbie Brandon / Cynthia Rentz3-6, 4-6
2021-06-28vs GCC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesJulie Bock / Tori Hutchens vs Lisa Adams / Heidi Wolfe4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMegan Muller vs Stephanie Carreira6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristy Jones / Vicki Devine vs Jennifer Steelman / Betsy Phillips1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lester / Annie Humphrey vs Diedre Wooden / Shannon Johnson4-6, 2-6
2021-06-21vs CACM GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesTori Hutchens / Annie Humphrey vs Amy Abalos / Liza Butterfield6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMegan Muller vs Sonja Russell4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Devine / Jennifer Urbonas vs Angie Sanders / Nancy Hallowell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Hogan / Christy Jones vs Robin Ashmore-Guin / Patricia Curry0-6, 5-7
2021-06-14vs LTFC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMegan Muller / Annie Humphrey vs Nancy Brooks / Brandi Renick-Smith6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJennifer Urbonas vs Melissa Blake4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Bock / Christy Jones vs Ashley Gonzales / DNita Andrews6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVicki Devine / Jennifer Lester vs Ashley Agrelius / Anna Carmody4-6, 4-6
2021-06-07vs HG REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesJulie Bock / Doris Pearson vs Julie Sanders / Kristi Piazza0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMegan Muller vs Julie Garside3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Urbonas / Vicki Devine vs Clare Ambrose / Paige Jones4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKay Huemoeller / Jennifer Lester vs Sandra Stephenson / Megann Rundell3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tori Hutchens
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Jennifer Urbonas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.67
Megan Muller
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.65
Annie Humphrey
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.47
Christy Jones
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Jennifer Lester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Doris Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Julie Bock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Vicki Devine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Kay Huemoeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Humphrey + Tori Hutchens8653% games+1.9% vs expected
Tori Hutchens + Megan Muller6354% games+1.2% vs expected
Julie Bock + Megan Muller3555% games+0.2% vs expected
Julie Bock + Christy Jones61242% games−4.3% vs expected
Jennifer Lester + Vicki Devine3745% games−5.6% vs expected
Vicki Devine + Doris Pearson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tori Hutchens
75W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Jennifer Urbonas
34W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Megan Muller
40W–54L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Annie Humphrey
36W–30L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.65
3.5
Christy Jones
32W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jennifer Lester
43W–51L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Doris Pearson
8W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Bock
33W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Vicki Devine
34W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
Kay Huemoeller
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Mary Hogan
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.