Teams

Pocket Aces

2026 TRI-LEVEL - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pocket Aces7121311183
2Spin Doctors Tri-Level3561839265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Thomas Schoeck
published
Anthony Hunt
published 5
4.75
Masimba Ruwo
published 5
4.59
Alex Wong
published 4.5
4.56
Zachary Fohn
published 4.5
4.51
Tyler Neill
published 5
4.46
Kevin Jay
published 4.5
4.29
Victor Do
published 4.5
4.10
Jacob Roberts
published 4
3.97
John Perry
published 4
3.95
Brian Johnson
published 4
3.94
Rick Roby
published 4
3.75
Kirk Porritt
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Johnson + Rick Roby6163% games+12.2% vs expected
Zachary Fohn + Alex Wong9169% games+10.5% vs expected
Victor Do + Alex Wong23362% games+8.4% vs expected
Zachary Fohn + Victor Do6261% games+6.7% vs expected
Rick Roby + Kirk Porritt7355% games−2.6% vs expected
Anthony Hunt + Tyler Neill141052% games−9.7% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Kirk Porritt7167% gamesnot enough data
Brian Johnson + Jacob Roberts404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Schoeck
28W–10L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.77
5
Anthony Hunt
193W–55L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Masimba Ruwo
92W–56L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.75
4.5
Alex Wong
219W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
4.59
4.5
Zachary Fohn
150W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.56
5
Tyler Neill
100W–81L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.51
4.5
Kevin Jay
42W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Victor Do
121W–59L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4
Jacob Roberts
92W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
4.10
4
John Perry
186W–122L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Brian Johnson
207W–115L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Rick Roby
293W–104L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Kirk Porritt
221W–136L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.