Teams

Spin Doctors Tri-Level

2026 TRI-LEVEL - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.35 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-03vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrevor Jones / Kyle Gonelli vs Thomas Schoeck / Masimba Ruwo4-6, 6-7
2026-02-17vs Pocket AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Gonelli / Eric Lim vs Thomas Schoeck / Masimba Ruwo4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMike O'Toole / Adam Martin vs Zachary Fohn / Alex Wong2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-10vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Lim / Shane Garner vs Peter Questad / Evan Walther6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-05vs Pocket AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Martin / Mike O'Toole vs Tyler Neill / Masimba Ruwo2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Phan / Eric Lim vs Alex Wong / Kevin Jay1-6, 6-7
2026-01-29vs RacqueteersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Gonelli / Trevor Jones vs Greg Ferney / Evan Walther7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric Lim / Dylan Raymond vs Jonathan Jones / Kyle Jewett4-6, 3-6
2026-01-27vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDylan Raymond / Mike O'Toole vs Zachary Fohn / Alex Wong3-6, 2-6
2026-01-20vs RacqueteersWon 20
W#1 DoublesShane Garner / Kyle Gonelli vs Peter Questad / Greg Ferney6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Martin / Mike O'Toole vs Jonathan Jones / Kevin Malecha6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pocket Aces7121311183
2Spin Doctors Tri-Level3561839265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Trevor Jones
published 5
4.69
Shane Garner
published 5
4.26
Adam Martin
published 4.5
4.18
Dylan Raymond
published 4.5
4.08
Christopher Phan
published 4.5
3.86
Justin Endow
published 4
3.82
Justin Armstrong
published 4
3.77
3.75
Idrar Husic
published 4
3.71
Jeremy Canning
published 4
Eric Lim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kyle Gonelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mike O'Toole
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Raymond + Adam Martin4455% games+2.4% vs expected
Jeremy Canning + Justin Endow241456% games+0.8% vs expected
Mike O'Toole + Adam Martin161354% gamesnot enough data
Dylan Raymond + Mike O'Toole6257% gamesnot enough data
Mike O'Toole + Justin Endow3554% gamesnot enough data
Dylan Raymond + Jeremy Canning5162% gamesnot enough data
Justin Endow + Chris Christensen1437% gamesnot enough data
Trevor Jones + Kyle Gonelli044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Trevor Jones
39W–24L career · type S · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Shane Garner
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Adam Martin
100W–66L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Dylan Raymond
80W–65L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Christopher Phan
68W–42L career · no lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Justin Endow
147W–88L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Justin Armstrong
43W–35L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Chris Christensen
61W–69L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Idrar Husic
78W–32L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Jeremy Canning
164W–151L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Eric Lim
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Gonelli
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike O'Toole
53W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.