Teams

SS-H ORANGE

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesWhitney Baylor / Jennifer Lobb vs Susan Goldman / Stephanie Smith1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-21vs WC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Aarnio / Monica Reidelbach vs Lisa Nelson / Laura Ream6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWhitney Baylor / Jennifer Lobb vs Allison Murray / Stacey Williams1-6, 2-6
2024-04-13vs PRC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesTina Burton / Kathy Aarnio vs Amber Harris / Candace Sotwick6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesWhitney Baylor vs Celeste Gardner5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lobb / Phuong Banh vs Teresa Hahn / Denise Coleman4-6, 5-7
2024-04-13vs HRCA-S NAVYLost 02
L#1 SinglesKathy Aarnio vs Elizabeth Luce1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSahana Mallela / Whitney Baylor vs Soyon Bueno / Robin DiCicco1-6, 4-6
2024-03-30vs LTFC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Aarnio / Monica Reidelbach vs Leena Keshwani / Johanna Tiwari1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSahana Mallela / Jennifer Lobb vs Leanne Franke / Molly Robbins3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Phuong Banh
published
3.02
Kathy Aarnio
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.94
Tina Burton
published
2.90
Whitney Baylor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Monica Reidelbach
published
2.52
Jennifer Lobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Lobb + Kathy Aarnio2351% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Lobb + Whitney Baylor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phuong Banh
21W–16L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Kathy Aarnio
73W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Tina Burton
39W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Whitney Baylor
78W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Monica Reidelbach
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Jennifer Lobb
68W–93L career · 4 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.