Teams

HRCA-S NAVY

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs LTFC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Robin DiCicco vs Leanne Franke / Andrea Caldwell6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTamiko Norris / Becki Jernigan vs Leena Keshwani / Molly Robbins3-6, 3-6
2024-04-20vs PRC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecki Jernigan / Tamiko Norris vs Sharon Kisch / Amber Harris4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRobin DiCicco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Kim / Soyon Bueno vs Teresa Hahn / Lori Lee7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-13vs SS-H ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesTamiko Norris / Becki Jernigan vs Tina Burton / Monica Reidelbach3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Robin DiCicco vs Sahana Mallela / Whitney Baylor6-1, 6-4
2024-04-06vs PRKR ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Robin DiCicco vs Stephanie Smith / Shannon Fronapfel7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Tamiko Norris vs Erika Fox / Robin Mortenson6-4, 7-6
2024-03-30vs WC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesTamiko Norris / Becki Jernigan vs Allison Murray / SUSAN MORAVEK6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Susan Kim vs Laura Ream / Lisa Knurek6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC SILVER5012310111
2HRCA-S NAVY4111412114
3HFII NAVY419615136
4KNO BLUE3210512112
5GAC GOLD329612104
6HFII YELLOW329617128
7PRKR ORANGE236918144
8WP-O GREEN1431225161
9SS-HP NAVY1421327172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Elizabeth Luce
published 3
2.85
Robin DiCicco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Becki Jernigan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Soyon Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Tamiko Norris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Soyon Bueno + Robin DiCicco12358% games+3.8% vs expected
Becki Jernigan + Soyon Bueno131347% games+3.5% vs expected
Becki Jernigan + Tamiko Norris12159% games−0.4% vs expected
Tamiko Norris + Robin DiCicco3356% games−0.6% vs expected
Becki Jernigan + Robin DiCicco2447% gamesnot enough data
Soyon Bueno + Tamiko Norris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Luce
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Robin DiCicco
92W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Becki Jernigan
107W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.63
3
Soyon Bueno
139W–134L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
Tamiko Norris
39W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.