Teams

CDTA S A65M8.0 2River Trails Gilbertson Tue 6:30 $26

CDTA 1Summer Adult 65 & over · CDTA 65 & Over M 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesJay Freedman / Bruce Thornquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBruce Thornquist / Stephen Chertok vs Daniel Robin / Robert Hughes6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Costigan / Stephen Chertok vs Robert Hughes / Daniel Robin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJay Freedman / Bruce Thornquist vs Alan Wolan / Mark MacDonald6-2, 6-2
2025-06-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McLean / Stephen Chertok vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonald O'Malley / Stephen Chertok vs Mark MacDonald / Daniel Robin6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CDTA 65 & Over M 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A65M8.0 2River Trails Gilbertson Tue 6:30 $2660180037
2CDTA S A65M8.0 1River Trails Spangler Tue 6:30 $260601836217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jay Freedman
published
3.81
3.78
Bruce Thornquist
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Stephen Chertok
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Donald O'Malley
published
Jay Morgan
published
John Griffin
published
Joseph Costigan
published
Richard McLean
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rod Schroeder
published
Thomas Gilbertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Freedman + Rod Schroeder5271% gamesnot enough data
John Griffin + Thomas Gilbertson5158% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Gilbertson + Jay Freedman4263% gamesnot enough data
Jay Morgan + Bruce Thornquist5066% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Costigan + Jay Freedman4157% gamesnot enough data
John Griffin + Stephen Chertok224 matchesnot enough data
John Griffin + Jay Freedman303 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Costigan + Richard McLean213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Freedman
62W–49L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
David Alvah Martin
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Bruce Thornquist
236W–97L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Stephen Chertok
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Donald O'Malley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Morgan
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Griffin
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Costigan
37W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard McLean
143W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rod Schroeder
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Gilbertson
45W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.