Teams

SSLT RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-24vs PRKR NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesBob Louden / Dan Lobb vs Kirby Carter / Randy Tait5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Devens / David Peakman vs Scott Mannix / Jeff Skolnick3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRich Marks / Richard Holt vs Robert Kirch / Gerry Cabot1-6, 4-6
2022-07-13vs HRCA GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Huffman / David Peakman vs Daniel Bruetting / Frank Johns5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Brandon Dale7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRich Marks / Richard Holt vs Len Herstein / Michael Schneider4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-06vs CACI BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesBen Edmonds / Steve Bocher vs Blair Gifford / Art Rerecich5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRich Marks / Richard Holt vs John Anderson / Vladimir Kvasnica3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-29vs PRC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBob Louden / Steven Huffman vs Jeffrey Davis / Paul Hemann7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Jason Kinsey2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Holt / Dan Lobb vs Alan Aguilar / Douglas Jones3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRich Marks / Steve Bocher vs John Wierzba / TJ VanderHeiden4-6, 4-6
2022-06-22vs CPV BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesSteven Huffman / Charles Parsons vs Christopher McDonald / Lon Stuebinger2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBen Edmonds vs Chad Williams3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Devens / Steve Bocher vs Alexis Tibar / Bill Smart4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBob Louden / David Peakman vs Michael Shorts / Josh Reel6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-15vs PRKR NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesCharles Parsons / Michael Devens vs Martin Powers / Taylor Still3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBob Louden vs Randy Tait3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Huffman / Steve Bocher vs Jeffrey Shepard / David Frank4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan Lobb / Rich Marks vs Robert Kirch / Kirby Carter4-6, 3-6
2022-06-08vs HRCA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Louden / Steve Bocher vs John Guzak / Timothy Berg1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRichard Holt / Charles Parsons vs John Belcher / Frank Johns6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDan Lobb / David Peakman vs Michael Schneider / Len Herstein5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Ben Edmonds
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Charles Parsons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Peakman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Bob Louden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Dan Lobb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Rich Marks
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Michael Devens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Bocher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Steven Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Lobb + Ben Edmonds3250% games+2.0% vs expected
Steven Huffman + Bob Louden3246% games−3.8% vs expected
Bob Louden + Ben Edmonds2349% gamesnot enough data
David Peakman + Dan Lobb134 matchesnot enough data
Bob Louden + Charles Parsons044 matchesnot enough data
Steven Huffman + Charles Parsons033 matchesnot enough data
Dan Lobb + Rich Marks033 matchesnot enough data
Steve Bocher + Rich Marks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Edmonds
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Charles Parsons
10W–28L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Peakman
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bob Louden
46W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Dan Lobb
18W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Rich Marks
36W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Michael Devens
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Bocher
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Huffman
5W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.