Teams

CACI BLACK

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs HRCA GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesWilliam Alquist / Blair Gifford vs John Belcher / John Guzak6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJim Steavpack vs Brandon Dale3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJim Donald / Rich Murri vs Michael Schneider / Frank Johns6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVladimir Kvasnica / Jon Wright vs David Pearson / Len Herstein6-4, 6-3
2022-07-13vs CPV BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesArt Rerecich / John Anderson vs Alexis Tibar / Tony Hildebrand3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJim Steavpack vs Josh Reel4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Alquist / Rich Murri vs Christopher McDonald / Michael Hance4-6
L#3 DoublesVladimir Kvasnica / Adam Rosenberg vs Bryan Badger / Michael Shorts3-6, 1-6
2022-07-06vs SSLT REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesBlair Gifford / Art Rerecich vs Ben Edmonds / Steve Bocher5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWilliam Alquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Anderson / Vladimir Kvasnica vs Rich Marks / Richard Holt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-29vs PRKR NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesBlair Gifford / William Alquist vs Martin Powers / Jeffrey Shepard4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Cranston vs Scott Mannix0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Anderson / Jon Wright vs Kirby Carter / Britt Chichester3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArt Rerecich / Vladimir Kvasnica vs David Frank / Michael Stelzig0-6, 2-6
2022-06-22vs PRC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesBlair Gifford / William Alquist vs Jeffrey Davis / Chris Driscoll6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJim Steavpack vs Pat Conroy6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLou Gobis / Adam Rosenberg vs Alan Aguilar / Jason Kinsey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVladimir Kvasnica / John Cranston vs John Wierzba / Douglas Jones6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs HRCA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Alquist / Blair Gifford vs John Guzak / Daniel Bruetting6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRich Murri / Art Rerecich vs Frank Johns / John Belcher7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLou Gobis / Jim Steavpack vs Michael Schneider / Jung-Jae Lee6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-08vs CPV BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJim Donald / Rich Murri vs Michael Vernon / Lon Stuebinger5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Cranston vs Josh Reel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Alquist / Adam Rosenberg vs Bryan Badger / Bill Henry4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLou Gobis / Jon Wright vs Michael Hance / Michael Shorts6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR BLUE6120822223
2PRKR NAVY52181024235
3BM GOLD43111736269
4EM GOLD33111328205
5TTA NAVY3419922175
6CACI BLACK34121633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Jon Wright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
William Alquist
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
John Cranston
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Lou Gobis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Blair Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jim Steavpack
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Vladimir Kvasnica
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Art Rerecich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jim Donald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rich Murri
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Wright + Jim Donald4355% games+9.7% vs expected
Rich Murri + Jim Donald3250% games+4.1% vs expected
Blair Gifford + William Alquist7362% games+3.8% vs expected
Jon Wright + Vladimir Kvasnica4254% games+2.9% vs expected
William Alquist + Art Rerecich2842% games−11.6% vs expected
Rich Murri + Jon Wright2343% games−12.4% vs expected
Vladimir Kvasnica + Art Rerecich224 matchesnot enough data
Blair Gifford + Vladimir Kvasnica213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Wright
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
William Alquist
69W–52L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
John Cranston
68W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lou Gobis
44W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Blair Gifford
62W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Jim Steavpack
74W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Vladimir Kvasnica
35W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Art Rerecich
25W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Donald
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rich Murri
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.