Teams

Dodsworth-GI

2025 CORTA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Fall · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-21vs Edmonson-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Boles / Tiffany Davis vs Ashish Pingale / Andi Lee6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBlade Massey / Cynthia Lingo vs Joshua Kennington / Tricia Keller4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNishant de Quadros / Sandi Vaughn vs Paul Fahnestock / Munkyung Kim4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-12-05vs Edmonson-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Gordon / Skyla Pyron vs Joshua Kennington / Tricia Keller6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNeil Desai / Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne vs David Williams / Jamie Williams6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBlade Massey / Sandi Vaughn vs Matt Edmonson / Haesook Joo6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Matthew Boles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Sandi Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Nishant de Quadros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Neil Desai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Ryan Dodsworth
published
3.39
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Ryan Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Sarah Prichard
published
3.25
Skyla Pyron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Blade Massey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.19
Paige Penner
published
3.18
Cynthia Lingo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Lingo + Paige Penner4747% games+1.6% vs expected
Nishant de Quadros + Sandi Vaughn224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Gordon + Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne + Nishant de Quadros123 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Prichard + Nishant de Quadros213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Boles
21W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Sandi Vaughn
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Nishant de Quadros
36W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Neil Desai
71W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Ryan Dodsworth
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Ryan Gordon
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
Sarah Prichard
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Skyla Pyron
21W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
4
Blade Massey
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.24
Paige Penner
22W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
4
Cynthia Lingo
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.