Teams

IE-LLW-TCC-Cardona

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-23vs IE-Elevenis-NgoWon 10
W#3 DoublesTom Cardona / Kirk Willmarth vs Humberto Salcido / Ken Tomoyasu4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-11-22vs IE-MTC-DuncanWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictor Bernardez / Mark Mendoza vs David Duncan / Wayne Payton6-3, 6-3
2025-11-08vs IE-Bear Creek-UstarizWon 10
W#3 DoublesVictor Bernardez / Eric Purtell vs Bill Conlin / Robert Legagneur6-3, 6-3
2025-11-02vs IE-Elevenis-NgoLost 01
L#3 DoublesTom Cardona / Beau Joseph vs Kevin Dang / Ken Tomoyasu2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-25vs IE-RCC-LiLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Mendoza / Victor Bernardez vs Ricardo Gutierres / Ulysses Gerardo4-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs IE-Bear Valley-MejiaWon 10
W#3 DoublesVictor Bernardez / Mark Mendoza vs Erkut Aykutlug / Alfonso Nevarez6-2, 7-6
2025-09-21vs IE-RCC-LiLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Cardona / Dennis Ho vs Dan Zhuo / Ricardo Gutierres1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
James Hoffman
published
Daniel Boutros
published 4
3.73
Kirk Willmarth
published
3.63
Dennis Ho
published 3.5
3.57
Stuart Yang
published
3.51
Beau Joseph
published 3.5
3.45
Eric Purtell
published
3.39
Victor Bernardez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Tom Cardona
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
David Nighbert
published 3.5
3.16
Mark Mendoza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beau Joseph + Tom Cardona314 matchesnot enough data
Eric Purtell + Mark Mendoza314 matchesnot enough data
Beau Joseph + Stuart Yang123 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Ho + Tom Cardona213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Mendoza + David Nighbert213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Cardona + David Nighbert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Hoffman
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Daniel Boutros
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirk Willmarth
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Dennis Ho
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Stuart Yang
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Beau Joseph
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Eric Purtell
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Victor Bernardez
99W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Tom Cardona
99W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
David Nighbert
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Mark Mendoza
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.