Teams

IE-CL-Liz Cardoza/Jennifer Helbock

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Sandee Clow vs Teresa Festorazzi / Andrea Van Soest2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKathie Clay / Therese Washle vs Michaella Deshaw / Kelsey Cane3-6, 0-6
2022-10-30vs IE-APTC-Jo Russo-PereyraLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathie Clay / Kerry Keith vs Dorothy Geiger / Elizabeth Curtiss0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn van Vleet / Therese Washle vs Jill Stephens / GINA SKIBAR1-6, 3-6
2022-10-22vs IE-CCCC-E. RydallLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathie Clay / Kerry Keith vs Donna Crow / Jennifer Hughey4-6, 3-6
2022-10-16vs IE-CCCC-E. RydallLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanette Conlin / Kathie Clay vs Donna Crow / Elizabeth Rydall7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTherese Washle / Carolyn van Vleet vs Terri Burchinal / Lisa Contreras1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn van Vleet / Linda Hockenbery vs Michelle Roe / Sandra Moya4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Carrie Collins vs Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Heather Smith4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Carrie Collins
published 3
2.97
Alicia Taverner
published 3
2.95
Therese Washle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Satoko Parsons
published
2.77
Danette Conlin
published 3
2.69
2.67
Kathie Clay
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.66
Kim Hoyer
published
2.53
Sandee Clow
published
2.42
Jennifer Helbock
published
2.36
Linda Hockenbery
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Julie Sell
published
Tina Maslach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danette Conlin + Carrie Collins3454% games+6.3% vs expected
Kathie Clay + Therese Washle4448% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Collins + Therese Washle404 matchesnot enough data
Danette Conlin + Therese Washle303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie Collins
18W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Alicia Taverner
18W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Therese Washle
30W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Satoko Parsons
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Danette Conlin
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Cardoza
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Kathie Clay
40W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Kim Hoyer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Sandee Clow
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jennifer Helbock
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Linda Hockenbery
34W–106L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36
Julie Sell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Maslach
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.