Teams

IE-Baby Got Backhand-MTC-Jeanne Shelter

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-18vs IE-CCCC-E. RydallLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichaella Deshaw / Alicia Larson vs Lydia Aragon / Donna Crow4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Kelsey Cane vs Stacy Westfall / Jennivieve Randolph4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Marchese / Alicia Larson vs Sandra Moya / Cathy Williams0-6, 1-6
2022-11-06vs IE-CL-Liz Cardoza/Jennifer HelbockSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSharon Baker / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty vs Jennifer Helbock / Elizabeth Cardoza2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlicia Larson / Diana Welty-Guerrero vs Sandee Clow / Satoko Parsons6-4, 6-2
2022-11-05vs IE-CCCC-E. RydallWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Montero / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty vs Lydia Aragon / Heidi Brun2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-23vs IE-APTC-Jo Russo-PereyraLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Sharon Baker vs Jo Russo-Pereyra / Jill Stephens0-6, 3-6
2022-10-02vs IE-APTC-Jo Russo-PereyraLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Baker / Alicia Larson vs Elizabeth Curtiss / Alejandrina Martinez2-6, 0-6
2022-09-11vs IE-CL-Liz Cardoza/Jennifer HelbockLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Heather Smith vs Linda Hockenbery / Carrie Collins6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Kelsey Cane
published
3.49
Michaella Deshaw
published 3.5
3.02
Alicia Larson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
2.58
Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
Tristina Hayes
published
2.50
Irene Capen
published 2.5
Jeanne Shelter
published
Lisa Montero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tristina Hayes + Diana Welty-Guerrero2443% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey Cane
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Michaella Deshaw
55W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3
Alicia Larson
59W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Diana Welty-Guerrero
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
20W–83L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Tristina Hayes
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Irene Capen
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%49%51%
2.50
Jeanne Shelter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Montero
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.